The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 January 31. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 07:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Deleted by Writ Keeper per WP:G5 (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 21:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused template (note: It was on the Soreh Cinema article) of unclear purpose. DexDor (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete and replace with normal image syntax. Following up on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 12#Template:Click. Not objective, but this could probably be speedy as this is the same exact argument as the previous template. Gonnym ( talk) 11:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 08:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
At Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Editor consensus regarding Europeana and Wikidata Property 7704, it became clear that the quality of Europeana is often not good, and that editors preferred not to link to Europeana at all, or to include it in authority control, but at least not to have a more prominent separate template.
However, the editor who created the template and started the VPP discussion (after a complaint about the quality from another editor at his user talk page) then added a summary concluding that the template could be used anyway.
Europeana seems like a good initiative, but so far with seriously flawed results, and as such should not be template-linked from our articles. Fram ( talk) 11:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Feedback from Europeana see T243764#5833958 - Salgo60 ( talk) 12:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 January 31. (non-admin closure) ‑‑ Trialpears ( talk) 07:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Deleted by Writ Keeper per WP:G5 (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 21:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused template (note: It was on the Soreh Cinema article) of unclear purpose. DexDor (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Delete and replace with normal image syntax. Following up on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 12#Template:Click. Not objective, but this could probably be speedy as this is the same exact argument as the previous template. Gonnym ( talk) 11:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs ( talk) 08:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
At Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Editor consensus regarding Europeana and Wikidata Property 7704, it became clear that the quality of Europeana is often not good, and that editors preferred not to link to Europeana at all, or to include it in authority control, but at least not to have a more prominent separate template.
However, the editor who created the template and started the VPP discussion (after a complaint about the quality from another editor at his user talk page) then added a summary concluding that the template could be used anyway.
Europeana seems like a good initiative, but so far with seriously flawed results, and as such should not be template-linked from our articles. Fram ( talk) 11:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Feedback from Europeana see T243764#5833958 - Salgo60 ( talk) 12:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)