The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Strong support per nom. Can readily be merged, and better here to have an easily updatable box than individual per series / show ones. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 00:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)reply
I think I'll oppose this for now - I'm not sure if a "family" fits in the character infobox. Might be better served with {{Infobox fictional race}} or as a generic {{Infobox fictional family}}. --
Gonnym (
talk) 14:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Support - consider also merging Template:Infobox soap character into Template:Infobox character. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 14:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose for now (further to my above comment) because I'm not convinced that it can be fully merged, especially the drop-down family part. I created this template so that each family member would have a mini-infobox within this infobox - see
Ferreira family for an example - there are no separate articles or sections where each character could have their own character infobox. If someone can guarantee that it will be fine, then I would change my !vote, but I would only support a merge with
Template:Infobox soap character. —
🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 22:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose I don't think merging these templates makes editing easier because, although conceptually related, they are pretty different including titles, parameters and function. I suggest
Zackmann08 explores around and maybe creates a {{Fictional family}} to which things can be merged instead? --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 05:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)reply
I'd support that too. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Strong support per nom. Can readily be merged, and better here to have an easily updatable box than individual per series / show ones. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 00:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)reply
I think I'll oppose this for now - I'm not sure if a "family" fits in the character infobox. Might be better served with {{Infobox fictional race}} or as a generic {{Infobox fictional family}}. --
Gonnym (
talk) 14:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Support - consider also merging Template:Infobox soap character into Template:Infobox character. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 14:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose for now (further to my above comment) because I'm not convinced that it can be fully merged, especially the drop-down family part. I created this template so that each family member would have a mini-infobox within this infobox - see
Ferreira family for an example - there are no separate articles or sections where each character could have their own character infobox. If someone can guarantee that it will be fine, then I would change my !vote, but I would only support a merge with
Template:Infobox soap character. —
🌼📽️AnemoneProjectors💬 22:18, 2 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose I don't think merging these templates makes editing easier because, although conceptually related, they are pretty different including titles, parameters and function. I suggest
Zackmann08 explores around and maybe creates a {{Fictional family}} to which things can be merged instead? --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 05:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)reply
I'd support that too. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:43, 13 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).