The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unneeded for navigation.
Martijn Hoekstra (
talk) 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
JMHamo (
talk) 16:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:NENAN, and the only three articles with blue links are all undergoing
AfD. —
Jkudlicktcs 09:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per the Snowman's rationale above.
Dirtlawyer1 (
talk) 22:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unusable for navigation.
Martijn Hoekstra (
talk) 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Navbox that doesn't navigate to any relevant articles. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 13:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. A navbox with all redlinks can be useful if the subjects are notable (e.g. for a related group of people who pass WP:POLITICIAN), but in this case, we don't know if any of the camps are notable. Restore if WP:GNG-proven articles are written about two or more of the camps.
Nyttend (
talk) 19:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as premature per Nyttend —PC-XT+ 08:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per Nyttend. No useable links for the listed summer camps, no evidence of notability of the subject, and the absence of a stand-alone list or article to support this navbox. Three strikes, and out.
Dirtlawyer1 (
talk) 22:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unneeded for navigation.
Martijn Hoekstra (
talk) 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
JMHamo (
talk) 16:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
DeleteWP:NENAN, and the only three articles with blue links are all undergoing
AfD. —
Jkudlicktcs 09:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per the Snowman's rationale above.
Dirtlawyer1 (
talk) 22:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unusable for navigation.
Martijn Hoekstra (
talk) 11:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Navbox that doesn't navigate to any relevant articles. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 13:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. A navbox with all redlinks can be useful if the subjects are notable (e.g. for a related group of people who pass WP:POLITICIAN), but in this case, we don't know if any of the camps are notable. Restore if WP:GNG-proven articles are written about two or more of the camps.
Nyttend (
talk) 19:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as premature per Nyttend —PC-XT+ 08:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per Nyttend. No useable links for the listed summer camps, no evidence of notability of the subject, and the absence of a stand-alone list or article to support this navbox. Three strikes, and out.
Dirtlawyer1 (
talk) 22:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.