The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Speedy keep unless a rationale is given.
Mackensen(talk) 00:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. per above.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I nominated these for discussion because i felt those were spam. Sorry for the confusions. --
L o gX 13:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Speedy keep unless a rationale is given.
Mackensen(talk) 00:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. per above.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I nominated these for discussion because i felt those were spam. Sorry for the confusions. --
L o gX 13:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Speedy keep unless a rationale is given.
Mackensen(talk) 00:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. per above.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I nominated these for discussion because i felt those were spam. Sorry for the confusions. --
L o gX 13:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
no longer used after being merged with {{player}}.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template with just one link.
...William 18:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete (as creator). ACME used to have enough stations to merit a navbox but they've sold them all off, so this is the result. This should be construed as a speedy G7.
Raymie (
t •
c) 22:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
delete, unused and more complicated than sidebar. —
Lfdder (
talk) 00:39, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unused fb team templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
delete per prior consensus.
Frietjes (
talk) 14:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - a long-term goal would be to get rid of all of those "fb" templates.
Mentoz86 (
talk) 14:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Speedy keep unless a rationale is given.
Mackensen(talk) 00:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. per above.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I nominated these for discussion because i felt those were spam. Sorry for the confusions. --
L o gX 13:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Speedy keep unless a rationale is given.
Mackensen(talk) 00:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. per above.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I nominated these for discussion because i felt those were spam. Sorry for the confusions. --
L o gX 13:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator.
Speedy keep unless a rationale is given.
Mackensen(talk) 00:29, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep. per above.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I nominated these for discussion because i felt those were spam. Sorry for the confusions. --
L o gX 13:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
no longer used after being merged with {{player}}.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template with just one link.
...William 18:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete (as creator). ACME used to have enough stations to merit a navbox but they've sold them all off, so this is the result. This should be construed as a speedy G7.
Raymie (
t •
c) 22:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
delete, unused and more complicated than sidebar. —
Lfdder (
talk) 00:39, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unused fb team templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom.
LT90001 (
talk) 06:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)reply
delete per prior consensus.
Frietjes (
talk) 14:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Delete - a long-term goal would be to get rid of all of those "fb" templates.
Mentoz86 (
talk) 14:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.