< October 14 | October 16 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused, Government of Maharashtra already uses an infobox. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Previously used on Sociétié Plon et autres v. Pierre Hugo et autres, where it was replaced with an instance of {{ Infobox court case}}. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Single use, should be merged with History of the National Assembly of Pakistan and deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was move Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
This template seems to achieve something undesirable, and is, I believe, contrary to the template namespace guideline. It creates a "subtitle", apparently for use in taxonomic articles. There is no history of using such subtitles on en.wiki, and I not aware of any discussion mandating their introduction. The guideline states that "[t]emplates should not do the work of article content in the main article namespace", and I believe this template contravenes that. Any alternative names, scientific or vernacular, can and should be included in the lead, and not in a subtitle. Stemonitis ( talk) 19:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Unnecessary template, with Template: Saints Row series and Template: Red Faction. Editing tests maybe? Redundant anyway. Soetermans. T / C 13:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, but I will rename it as suggested. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Only lists six articles; made redundant by Category:English Defence League — Richard BB 10:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
< October 14 | October 16 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused, Government of Maharashtra already uses an infobox. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Previously used on Sociétié Plon et autres v. Pierre Hugo et autres, where it was replaced with an instance of {{ Infobox court case}}. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge and delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Single use, should be merged with History of the National Assembly of Pakistan and deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was move Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Article content, should be moved to mainspace, userified or deleted. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 20:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
This template seems to achieve something undesirable, and is, I believe, contrary to the template namespace guideline. It creates a "subtitle", apparently for use in taxonomic articles. There is no history of using such subtitles on en.wiki, and I not aware of any discussion mandating their introduction. The guideline states that "[t]emplates should not do the work of article content in the main article namespace", and I believe this template contravenes that. Any alternative names, scientific or vernacular, can and should be included in the lead, and not in a subtitle. Stemonitis ( talk) 19:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Unnecessary template, with Template: Saints Row series and Template: Red Faction. Editing tests maybe? Redundant anyway. Soetermans. T / C 13:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, but I will rename it as suggested. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Only lists six articles; made redundant by Category:English Defence League — Richard BB 10:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)