The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
this is a navigation box that doesn't actually connect articles, since it is only used on one page. the survivors list is already in the "survivors" section in the article, and the location is already in the article as well. since no other articles include this, it is entirely unnecessary. Frietjes ( talk) 19:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree. It does not serve much of a purpose, and has very limited applicability.-- RSStockdale ( talk) 23:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:18, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Duplicates info already in {{ U-KISS}}, and even at that, only a few of the singles have articles, limiting its purpose of navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 17:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The articled for other songs are still on the work. Give more time so that articles will be completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JmKissme ( talk • contribs) 06:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
As per guideline at Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography navbox templates. Rob Sinden ( talk) 12:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Not currently used, a better template now exists, and is in placej at all appropriate articles ( Template:East Bay Regional Parks). this one has way too many redlinks, many links which are not appropriate for this template subject. creator is a blocked sockpuppeteer, so we wont be hearing from them. no one else seems to have worked on this template enough to possibly care much. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 00:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Fatally flawed template. Previously linked to sports women played, but did not receive coverage in articles (see edit summary from 5 April 2011). When somebody realized that, it was changed to a list of featured/good articles on women's sports, a distinction that isn't really template-worthy. Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 14:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 14:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
this is a navigation box that doesn't actually connect articles, since it is only used on one page. the survivors list is already in the "survivors" section in the article, and the location is already in the article as well. since no other articles include this, it is entirely unnecessary. Frietjes ( talk) 19:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree. It does not serve much of a purpose, and has very limited applicability.-- RSStockdale ( talk) 23:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:18, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Duplicates info already in {{ U-KISS}}, and even at that, only a few of the singles have articles, limiting its purpose of navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ( talk) 17:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The articled for other songs are still on the work. Give more time so that articles will be completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JmKissme ( talk • contribs) 06:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
As per guideline at Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography navbox templates. Rob Sinden ( talk) 12:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Not currently used, a better template now exists, and is in placej at all appropriate articles ( Template:East Bay Regional Parks). this one has way too many redlinks, many links which are not appropriate for this template subject. creator is a blocked sockpuppeteer, so we wont be hearing from them. no one else seems to have worked on this template enough to possibly care much. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 00:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR ( talk) 18:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Fatally flawed template. Previously linked to sports women played, but did not receive coverage in articles (see edit summary from 5 April 2011). When somebody realized that, it was changed to a list of featured/good articles on women's sports, a distinction that isn't really template-worthy. Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 14:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC) Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 14:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)