The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects ( talk) 18:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused template and unlikely to be used template. -- Suntag ☼ 17:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete per nom. I just had to. delldot ∇. 05:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused template and unlikely to be used template. -- Suntag ☼ 17:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused template and unlikely to be used template. -- Suntag ☼ 16:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Redundant to and in process of being replaced by {{ Infobox SPT subway station}}; see below. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 15:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Magioladitis ( talk) 12:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to {{
Infobox SPT station}}.
Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing);
Andy's talk;
Andy's edits 10:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
VERY STRONG Oppose - the template being used as a replacement {{ Infobox SPT station}} is not appropriate and has far too many fields as a suitable replacement. {{ Infobox SPT station}} is also rarely used with most GB stations in the SPT area using the main {{ Infobox GB station}} template. -- Stewart (talk) 15:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Additional - No longer redundant, the articles to all fifteen Subway stations are now correctly using this tempalte. The suggested replacement {{ Infobox SPT station}} is only being used for 11 of the Network Rail stations in the SPT, the remaining 200plus using {{ Infobox UK station}} (or the redirected replacement {{ Infobox GB station}}). Once the relevant NR stations have been migrated to {{ Infobox GB station}}, TfD should be proposed for {{ Infobox SPT station}}. -- Stewart (talk) 15:39, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 04:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to {{ Infobox station}}. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 11:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 06:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Template almost completely full of redlinks, no other rock by country article (eg. American rock, Australian rock) has a similar template Glass Cobra 10:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep -- Cenarium Talk 22:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
These templates have no use as they are redundant. There is no need to have individual templates for individual movies. Mythdon ( talk) 06:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete This template fails one of the basic premises of navigational templates: Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles. These songs are not related to one another. Per Wikipedia:Navigation templates: "Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" My answer would be no. We already have succession boxes that list the song before and after the song became number one with exact dates it was at number one and a link to the list of number one hits from that year. This template has no dates and uses numbers behind the wikilink which I presume to mean the number of weeks it was at number one. Aspects ( talk) 18:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused template and unlikely to be used template. -- Suntag ☼ 17:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete per nom. I just had to. delldot ∇. 05:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused template and unlikely to be used template. -- Suntag ☼ 17:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused template and unlikely to be used template. -- Suntag ☼ 16:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 05:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Redundant to and in process of being replaced by {{ Infobox SPT subway station}}; see below. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 15:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Magioladitis ( talk) 12:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to {{
Infobox SPT station}}.
Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing);
Andy's talk;
Andy's edits 10:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
VERY STRONG Oppose - the template being used as a replacement {{ Infobox SPT station}} is not appropriate and has far too many fields as a suitable replacement. {{ Infobox SPT station}} is also rarely used with most GB stations in the SPT area using the main {{ Infobox GB station}} template. -- Stewart (talk) 15:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Additional - No longer redundant, the articles to all fifteen Subway stations are now correctly using this tempalte. The suggested replacement {{ Infobox SPT station}} is only being used for 11 of the Network Rail stations in the SPT, the remaining 200plus using {{ Infobox UK station}} (or the redirected replacement {{ Infobox GB station}}). Once the relevant NR stations have been migrated to {{ Infobox GB station}}, TfD should be proposed for {{ Infobox SPT station}}. -- Stewart (talk) 15:39, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 04:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Unused. Redundant to {{ Infobox station}}. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 11:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. delldot ∇. 06:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Template almost completely full of redlinks, no other rock by country article (eg. American rock, Australian rock) has a similar template Glass Cobra 10:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Keep -- Cenarium Talk 22:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
These templates have no use as they are redundant. There is no need to have individual templates for individual movies. Mythdon ( talk) 06:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)