164.58.212.202 (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
This is an issue another user has expressed concern about and checking through the edits appeared to show a pretty wide-ranging problem and I was in the process of asking advice on the best approach.
It is worth noting that Magyar Kiss Kiss edited another article Zsuzsanna Budapest [1] which the IP has also edited [2]/ [3]. The last year-and-a-half's worth of that article's history is almost completely made up of SPAs doing exactly the same thing as they are in the Rachel Pollack article and need checking here (with the exception of Queenlaese). There may be other similar pages with the same problem but these are the two main ones I am aware of as well as the IP [4] and an SPA [5] on Eunuch.
The problem is that the user(s) are pushing an agenda that is violating WP:BLP as well as a consensus on how to deal with the issue sensitively which has lead to repeated reversions by a number of users. The persistence and single-minded nature (as well as the blatant BLP violation) take this out of the realm of simple disruptive editing and into the realm of vandalism. ( Emperor ( talk) 22:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)) reply
Might be best to leave it open at least a few weeks while we see if they come back. I'll freely admit to being a noobie on this stuff. 17:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anniepoo ( talk • contribs)
164.58.212.202 (
talk
+ ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
tag ·
block user ·
block log ·
CheckUser)
This is an issue another user has expressed concern about and checking through the edits appeared to show a pretty wide-ranging problem and I was in the process of asking advice on the best approach.
It is worth noting that Magyar Kiss Kiss edited another article Zsuzsanna Budapest [1] which the IP has also edited [2]/ [3]. The last year-and-a-half's worth of that article's history is almost completely made up of SPAs doing exactly the same thing as they are in the Rachel Pollack article and need checking here (with the exception of Queenlaese). There may be other similar pages with the same problem but these are the two main ones I am aware of as well as the IP [4] and an SPA [5] on Eunuch.
The problem is that the user(s) are pushing an agenda that is violating WP:BLP as well as a consensus on how to deal with the issue sensitively which has lead to repeated reversions by a number of users. The persistence and single-minded nature (as well as the blatant BLP violation) take this out of the realm of simple disruptive editing and into the realm of vandalism. ( Emperor ( talk) 22:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)) reply
Might be best to leave it open at least a few weeks while we see if they come back. I'll freely admit to being a noobie on this stuff. 17:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anniepoo ( talk • contribs)