Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jackjit

Jackjit ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
09 June 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Article on "Derty sesh" created by Openmonth98 was deleted with note, "Created by user Jackjit evading his block" [1] and now Solidpilot92 recreated same article shortly thereafter [2]. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 03:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also Tamerlane92 ( talk · contribs), Esol88 ( talk · contribs), Tarheal ( talk · contribs), Styps ( talk · contribs), Irgunnz ( talk · contribs) and numerous IP accounts mostly 118.* but also 210.55.9.24 ( talk · contribs) and 116.193.147.194 ( talk · contribs)- gadfium 04:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

They're all the same person. I've hardblocked an IP, please refile if more problems occur. TN X Man 16:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

14 June 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

From IP: Same edits to Murray Deaker as by previous sockpuppet Openmonth98 ( talk · contribs). BLP violations on Cameron Slater. Same IP range as other Jackjit IP edits.

From Mosteast: Account posted to Murray Deaker immediately following the IP. Shows same preoccupation with a donation by NZ Prime Minister John Key to Hadassah Medical Center as previous sockpuppet Tarheal ( talk · contribs) and with the criminal underworld. However, the edits themselves do not appear to be objectionable.

From Therapy98: Same pattern of edits on 8 June, should have been included in the earlier checkuser but I missed the name as he was blocked by another admin. gadfium 20:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
26 June 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


This edit here by 118.93.250.7 and this one by 118.93.246.126 are very similar to this edit by Jackjit's sockpuppet User:Openmonth98. There are also similar edits by 118.208.53.141 on Sonny Bill Williams [3]. IP 118.93.129.140's edits are not exactly the same, but due to the closesness of the address and the fact it is editing the same articles, it probably warrents investigation. [4] AIRcorn  (talk) 04:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Other probable IPs are 118.92.125.1, 118.93.102.2, 118.92.117.18, 118.92.96.226. Plus the following users have already been blocked User:Tarheal User:Irgunnz as sockpuppets and User talk:Therapy98 was blocked for vandelism. First time filing one of these so hope it is done right. AIRcorn  (talk) 04:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also Nasa212 ( talk · contribs) and Imonmyownsh*t ( talk · contribs)- gadfium 08:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
19 October 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


This is pretty similar to this. Therapy98 is a previous sockpuppet of Jackjits. AIRcorn  (talk) 06:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All of the accounts in the archive are  Stale and I saw no other accounts. TN X Man 14:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
10 December 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

These users don't look new to me at all plus how frequent edits are overlapping both in subject and time are a concerning. Also similar one liner userpage just adds to the suspicion. I had another possible sock but I left it out because I saw some minor evidence towards the opposite indication that it wasn't a sock. -- DQ (t) (e) 12:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

All blocked and tagged. WilliamH ( talk) 21:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jackjit/Archive&oldid=1090622753"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jackjit

Jackjit ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
09 June 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Article on "Derty sesh" created by Openmonth98 was deleted with note, "Created by user Jackjit evading his block" [1] and now Solidpilot92 recreated same article shortly thereafter [2]. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 03:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also Tamerlane92 ( talk · contribs), Esol88 ( talk · contribs), Tarheal ( talk · contribs), Styps ( talk · contribs), Irgunnz ( talk · contribs) and numerous IP accounts mostly 118.* but also 210.55.9.24 ( talk · contribs) and 116.193.147.194 ( talk · contribs)- gadfium 04:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

They're all the same person. I've hardblocked an IP, please refile if more problems occur. TN X Man 16:55, 9 June 2011 (UTC) reply

14 June 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

From IP: Same edits to Murray Deaker as by previous sockpuppet Openmonth98 ( talk · contribs). BLP violations on Cameron Slater. Same IP range as other Jackjit IP edits.

From Mosteast: Account posted to Murray Deaker immediately following the IP. Shows same preoccupation with a donation by NZ Prime Minister John Key to Hadassah Medical Center as previous sockpuppet Tarheal ( talk · contribs) and with the criminal underworld. However, the edits themselves do not appear to be objectionable.

From Therapy98: Same pattern of edits on 8 June, should have been included in the earlier checkuser but I missed the name as he was blocked by another admin. gadfium 20:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
26 June 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


This edit here by 118.93.250.7 and this one by 118.93.246.126 are very similar to this edit by Jackjit's sockpuppet User:Openmonth98. There are also similar edits by 118.208.53.141 on Sonny Bill Williams [3]. IP 118.93.129.140's edits are not exactly the same, but due to the closesness of the address and the fact it is editing the same articles, it probably warrents investigation. [4] AIRcorn  (talk) 04:09, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Other probable IPs are 118.92.125.1, 118.93.102.2, 118.92.117.18, 118.92.96.226. Plus the following users have already been blocked User:Tarheal User:Irgunnz as sockpuppets and User talk:Therapy98 was blocked for vandelism. First time filing one of these so hope it is done right. AIRcorn  (talk) 04:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also Nasa212 ( talk · contribs) and Imonmyownsh*t ( talk · contribs)- gadfium 08:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
19 October 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


This is pretty similar to this. Therapy98 is a previous sockpuppet of Jackjits. AIRcorn  (talk) 06:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All of the accounts in the archive are  Stale and I saw no other accounts. TN X Man 14:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC) reply
10 December 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

These users don't look new to me at all plus how frequent edits are overlapping both in subject and time are a concerning. Also similar one liner userpage just adds to the suspicion. I had another possible sock but I left it out because I saw some minor evidence towards the opposite indication that it wasn't a sock. -- DQ (t) (e) 12:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

All blocked and tagged. WilliamH ( talk) 21:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jackjit/Archive&oldid=1090622753"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE