This is a
failed proposal.
Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
the talk page or initiate a thread at
the village pump. |
This page in a nutshell: Neutral users (only) certify if a dispute resolution problem is valid. Trusted neutral users (only) then write suggested remedies. The community then certifies if the suggestions should be enforced. |
A very simple three-step system that can make trusted, basically final decisions on very tricky or complex matters, based on evaluations from trusted, neutral users on a given case.
In simple terms, this is how an RfR would flow:
There are two ways to approach this. "Standing" Remedy Committee members, with tenures of fixed duration, or a case-by-case jury model--your term of service is for that case, but you can work on multiple cases during the month, or year.
The RfR process comes after venues such as mediation (formal, or informal), third opinion, administrator noticeboards (any), and requests for comment, but before the Arbitration Committee. It is a framework for generating an unbiased, neutral, and fair solution to a dispute. The committee will take a complaint certified by the community. It will provide a suggested solutions, based on policy, precedent and good practice.
Request for remedies is intended to complement the existing dispute resolution process by addressing three basic points:
This is a
failed proposal.
Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use
the talk page or initiate a thread at
the village pump. |
This page in a nutshell: Neutral users (only) certify if a dispute resolution problem is valid. Trusted neutral users (only) then write suggested remedies. The community then certifies if the suggestions should be enforced. |
A very simple three-step system that can make trusted, basically final decisions on very tricky or complex matters, based on evaluations from trusted, neutral users on a given case.
In simple terms, this is how an RfR would flow:
There are two ways to approach this. "Standing" Remedy Committee members, with tenures of fixed duration, or a case-by-case jury model--your term of service is for that case, but you can work on multiple cases during the month, or year.
The RfR process comes after venues such as mediation (formal, or informal), third opinion, administrator noticeboards (any), and requests for comment, but before the Arbitration Committee. It is a framework for generating an unbiased, neutral, and fair solution to a dispute. The committee will take a complaint certified by the community. It will provide a suggested solutions, based on policy, precedent and good practice.
Request for remedies is intended to complement the existing dispute resolution process by addressing three basic points: