request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC) Clerk note: Deferred to Mackensen |
These users were created by two vandals from my school, whose ultimate goal is "to take [me] and Wikipedia down." They like to vandalize my userpage by flooding it with dozens of barnstars (they copy it and hold down Control-V for a while). Most recently, they attempted to impersonate me here and here. They originally vandalized through my school's IP addresses: , , , and , then moved on to using sleeper accounts and open proxies. This has gone on for over a month, and I am finally tired of it. This is what I know about them:
Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) ( Review me!) 22:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: Listed per blocked and unblocked accounts. BrandRadio12 appears to be a disruption-only account but Matthew Baird and Dominic Santiago appear to be users in good standing. Please explain why you think they should be checked. Thatcher131 02:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
On my talk page:
By BrandRadio12: *
Flooding my talkpage with barnstars, *
On-wiki confession of basically being the school vandal.
By YumMobile12:
By MeropeQueer:
On my userpage: By StairwayToUniden:
By BorgFreak:
By Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobob:
By Onikudaki:
By LucyJenkins2:
Impersonation attempt by Nwweaw: User talk:BorgQueen/archive3#Request User Check
Note that there are other users who have done the same, but it was over a month ago, and I believe that the CheckUser data is deleted for them then. Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) ( Review me!) 03:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Clerk assistance requested: Can we get key points on this from a clerk, please? Essjay (Talk) 09:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Additional information needed. Okay; what I need to see at this point is concrete evidence of a connection between the "main accounts" and the sockpuppets, and I would greatly appreciate if it was done in as few words/lines as possible. If, as Daniel suggests, much of this is based on real-life evidence and/or a personal knowledge of these individuals, then it might be better to submit the matter to formal dispute resolution rather than bringing it here, as we can only really consider what we can see in diff format. Essjay (Talk) 10:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Deferred Mackensen. It looks like he may have started on this one, I'm not completely sure. I'm deferring it to him until I hear differently. Essjay (Talk) 14:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch Filed: 22:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC) Clerk note: Deferred to Mackensen |
These users were created by two vandals from my school, whose ultimate goal is "to take [me] and Wikipedia down." They like to vandalize my userpage by flooding it with dozens of barnstars (they copy it and hold down Control-V for a while). Most recently, they attempted to impersonate me here and here. They originally vandalized through my school's IP addresses: , , , and , then moved on to using sleeper accounts and open proxies. This has gone on for over a month, and I am finally tired of it. This is what I know about them:
Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) ( Review me!) 22:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: Listed per blocked and unblocked accounts. BrandRadio12 appears to be a disruption-only account but Matthew Baird and Dominic Santiago appear to be users in good standing. Please explain why you think they should be checked. Thatcher131 02:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
On my talk page:
By BrandRadio12: *
Flooding my talkpage with barnstars, *
On-wiki confession of basically being the school vandal.
By YumMobile12:
By MeropeQueer:
On my userpage: By StairwayToUniden:
By BorgFreak:
By Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobob:
By Onikudaki:
By LucyJenkins2:
Impersonation attempt by Nwweaw: User talk:BorgQueen/archive3#Request User Check
Note that there are other users who have done the same, but it was over a month ago, and I believe that the CheckUser data is deleted for them then. Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) ( Review me!) 03:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Clerk assistance requested: Can we get key points on this from a clerk, please? Essjay (Talk) 09:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Additional information needed. Okay; what I need to see at this point is concrete evidence of a connection between the "main accounts" and the sockpuppets, and I would greatly appreciate if it was done in as few words/lines as possible. If, as Daniel suggests, much of this is based on real-life evidence and/or a personal knowledge of these individuals, then it might be better to submit the matter to formal dispute resolution rather than bringing it here, as we can only really consider what we can see in diff format. Essjay (Talk) 10:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Deferred Mackensen. It looks like he may have started on this one, I'm not completely sure. I'm deferring it to him until I hear differently. Essjay (Talk) 14:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)