If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mikegooderson}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Clerk note: Blocked Coldwinterday (confirmed) and Olivespread (suspected/probable based on behavior) indefinitely and blocked Mikegooderson for 48 hours. —
Wknight94 (
talk) 17:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Olivespread has protested his/her innocence and, taken with the "possible" checkuser result, I have unblocked. Please advise if the technical evidence was stronger than implied here. —
Wknight94 (
talk) 20:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
There are factors that prevent me from ruling it out. The technical evidence is certainly not enough to base a block on. In retrospect, a better answer would have been Inconclusive. Apologies for the infelicitous phrasing.
Sam Korn(smoddy) 20:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Coincidences can and do happen. But I confess that
Mikegooderson (
talk·contribs) accidentally becoming aware of
The Sufis – a then-orphaned new article – within 7 minutes of its being created by a first-time editor somehow strikes me as a long shot. Still,
in dubio pro reo and all that. Thanks,
Jayen466 21:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mikegooderson}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Clerk note: Blocked Coldwinterday (confirmed) and Olivespread (suspected/probable based on behavior) indefinitely and blocked Mikegooderson for 48 hours. —
Wknight94 (
talk) 17:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: Olivespread has protested his/her innocence and, taken with the "possible" checkuser result, I have unblocked. Please advise if the technical evidence was stronger than implied here. —
Wknight94 (
talk) 20:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
There are factors that prevent me from ruling it out. The technical evidence is certainly not enough to base a block on. In retrospect, a better answer would have been Inconclusive. Apologies for the infelicitous phrasing.
Sam Korn(smoddy) 20:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Coincidences can and do happen. But I confess that
Mikegooderson (
talk·contribs) accidentally becoming aware of
The Sufis – a then-orphaned new article – within 7 minutes of its being created by a first-time editor somehow strikes me as a long shot. Still,
in dubio pro reo and all that. Thanks,
Jayen466 21:02, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.