Case Closed as of 23 January 2005
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he/she would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.
On this case, 2 arbitrators are recused and one is inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.
Enacted 1) Pending resolution of this matter, Everyking is limited to one revert (partial or complete) per article per twenty-four hour period for the duration of this case. Should this be violated, Everyking may be blocked for up to 24 hours.
Enacted 2) Pending resolution of this matter, Everyking is restricted to one edit of any sort per twenty-four hour period on any article relating to Ashlee Simpson or containing material relating to Ashlee Simpson. Should this be violated, Everyking may be blocked for up to 24 hours. Should he use the admin rollback feature to edit such articles while blocked, he may be de-adminned for the duration of the case.
3) Pending resolution of this matter, Everyking is banned from editing Ashlee Simpson and any article relating to Ashlee Simpson or containing material relating to Ashlee Simpson. Should this be violated, Everyking may be blocked for up to 24 hours. Should he use the admin rollback feature to edit such articles while blocked or otherwise use his admin user rights to evade a block, he may be de-adminned for the duration of the case.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) No individual or selected group of people is entitled the right to control the content of an article. (See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles.)
2) Editors of Wikipedia are expected to abide by consensus when making edits.
3) Administrators of Wikipedia are trusted members of the community and are expected to follow Wikipedia policies. (See Wikipedia:Administrators.)
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) Everyking is a Wikipedia administrator.
2) Everyking has interpreted the three-revert rule in a liberal way and has aggressively engaged in editing which has resulted in his being blocked for violation of it [1].
3) Blocked for 24 hours for violations of the 3 revert rule, Everyking continued to use the rollback feature to revert vandalism available to him as a Wikipedia administrator [2].
4) Everyking has an apparent interest in Ashlee Simpson and the details of her life and work and has extensively edited articles which relate to her.
5) Everyking's edits to articles which relate to Ashlee Simpson sometimes carry the level of detail in the articles to a degree which other Wikipedia editors find inappropriate. Everyking has aggressively defended his edits and engaged in edit warring with respect to them, see, for example: this reversion to Autobiography (Ashlee Simpson album) made with the comment: "what on earth are you people thinking? i'll revert you till doomsday, i recorded that data week by week as it happened".
6) Everyking, outside of edits concerning Ashlee Simpson, is generally considered by the community to be an excellent editor.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) Everyking is required to reapply for adminship per procedures on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Should the reapplication not succeed, Everyking shall have his administrative priviledges removed.
2) Everyking is limited to one revert, partial or full, per twenty-four hour period on articles relating to Ashlee Simpson, with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule.
2.1) Everyking is limited to one edit of any sort per twenty-four hour period on articles relating to Ashlee Simpson or containing material on Ashlee Simpson, with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule.
2.2) For a period of one year, Everyking is prohibited from reverting articles relating to Ashlee Simpson except in cases of clear and obvious vandalism (as per definition at Wikipedia:Vandalism), with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule. What constitutes a revert shall be left up to adminstrators' discretion.
2.3) Everyking is prohibited from editing articles relating to Ashlee Simpson for one year.
3) In six months, if Everyking can demonstrate good behavior on Ashlee Simpson related articles, he may apply to the arbitration committee to have the revert parole(s) lifted.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
Four Aye votes needed to close case
Case Closed as of 23 January 2005
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he/she would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.
On this case, 2 arbitrators are recused and one is inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.
Enacted 1) Pending resolution of this matter, Everyking is limited to one revert (partial or complete) per article per twenty-four hour period for the duration of this case. Should this be violated, Everyking may be blocked for up to 24 hours.
Enacted 2) Pending resolution of this matter, Everyking is restricted to one edit of any sort per twenty-four hour period on any article relating to Ashlee Simpson or containing material relating to Ashlee Simpson. Should this be violated, Everyking may be blocked for up to 24 hours. Should he use the admin rollback feature to edit such articles while blocked, he may be de-adminned for the duration of the case.
3) Pending resolution of this matter, Everyking is banned from editing Ashlee Simpson and any article relating to Ashlee Simpson or containing material relating to Ashlee Simpson. Should this be violated, Everyking may be blocked for up to 24 hours. Should he use the admin rollback feature to edit such articles while blocked or otherwise use his admin user rights to evade a block, he may be de-adminned for the duration of the case.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) No individual or selected group of people is entitled the right to control the content of an article. (See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles.)
2) Editors of Wikipedia are expected to abide by consensus when making edits.
3) Administrators of Wikipedia are trusted members of the community and are expected to follow Wikipedia policies. (See Wikipedia:Administrators.)
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) Everyking is a Wikipedia administrator.
2) Everyking has interpreted the three-revert rule in a liberal way and has aggressively engaged in editing which has resulted in his being blocked for violation of it [1].
3) Blocked for 24 hours for violations of the 3 revert rule, Everyking continued to use the rollback feature to revert vandalism available to him as a Wikipedia administrator [2].
4) Everyking has an apparent interest in Ashlee Simpson and the details of her life and work and has extensively edited articles which relate to her.
5) Everyking's edits to articles which relate to Ashlee Simpson sometimes carry the level of detail in the articles to a degree which other Wikipedia editors find inappropriate. Everyking has aggressively defended his edits and engaged in edit warring with respect to them, see, for example: this reversion to Autobiography (Ashlee Simpson album) made with the comment: "what on earth are you people thinking? i'll revert you till doomsday, i recorded that data week by week as it happened".
6) Everyking, outside of edits concerning Ashlee Simpson, is generally considered by the community to be an excellent editor.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) Everyking is required to reapply for adminship per procedures on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Should the reapplication not succeed, Everyking shall have his administrative priviledges removed.
2) Everyking is limited to one revert, partial or full, per twenty-four hour period on articles relating to Ashlee Simpson, with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule.
2.1) Everyking is limited to one edit of any sort per twenty-four hour period on articles relating to Ashlee Simpson or containing material on Ashlee Simpson, with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule.
2.2) For a period of one year, Everyking is prohibited from reverting articles relating to Ashlee Simpson except in cases of clear and obvious vandalism (as per definition at Wikipedia:Vandalism), with penalties as per the Wikipedia:Three revert rule. What constitutes a revert shall be left up to adminstrators' discretion.
2.3) Everyking is prohibited from editing articles relating to Ashlee Simpson for one year.
3) In six months, if Everyking can demonstrate good behavior on Ashlee Simpson related articles, he may apply to the arbitration committee to have the revert parole(s) lifted.
proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
Four Aye votes needed to close case