While everyone agrees that a good administrator is characterized by many skills, most voters rely on edit count as their main criterion. This current imbalance is probably due to the desire to use measurable criteria. Therefore, I would want to encourage my fellow Wikipedians to come up with other measurable criteria. I would like to see this page as a chance for brainstorming.
(Disclaimer: I got this idea when I nominated Paul August. However, this proposal has nothing to do with this nomination since he easily meets all edit count standards.)
Sebastian
(talk) 22:18, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
See http://kohl.wikimedia.org/~kate/cgi-bin/count_edits.cgi .
Top rate counts how many of the last 250 major edits in article space carry the “(top)” marker.
While everyone agrees that a good administrator is characterized by many skills, most voters rely on edit count as their main criterion. This current imbalance is probably due to the desire to use measurable criteria. Therefore, I would want to encourage my fellow Wikipedians to come up with other measurable criteria. I would like to see this page as a chance for brainstorming.
(Disclaimer: I got this idea when I nominated Paul August. However, this proposal has nothing to do with this nomination since he easily meets all edit count standards.)
Sebastian
(talk) 22:18, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
See http://kohl.wikimedia.org/~kate/cgi-bin/count_edits.cgi .
Top rate counts how many of the last 250 major edits in article space carry the “(top)” marker.