From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Davodd

I've been an active member since November 2003, have a couple thousand edits under my belt and have been in the community long enough to understand the integral nature of Wikiquette and the NPOV policy in maintaining credibility and sustainability of this project. Although I turned down a previous suggestion of admin nomination in the past because of time obligations (full time school and full time work), I now have the time - and thorough understanding - of the WP community to be a good admin. Also, since I declined nomination in the past, think it is cheesy for me to ask someone to nominate me now - so I'm sticking my own neck out. Still, if there is a collective "no" to this self-nomination, I understand. I can still do 99% of what I want to do the old-fashioned way and have faith in the current batch of admins. Davodd 22:00, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)

Davodd has made 3,698 edits as of 12 June 2004. -- "DICK" CHENEY 22:48, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support

  1. A worthy candidate who would have had this earlier had he succumbed to peer pressure more readily. ;-) Glad to see him ready to take on the glory and tedium that is being an admin. Jwrosenzweig 22:46, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Support -- "DICK" CHENEY 22:48, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. Good contributions, deals with minor disagreements coolly. moink 22:51, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Merovingian Talk 23:06, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
  5. BCorr| Брайен 23:45, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  6. older wiser 00:40, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. JCarriker 02:20, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC) Has a great respect for community consensus; made great proposals at WikiProject U.S. Regions.
  8. Cecropia | Talk 03:39, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  9. Acegikmo1 23:46, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)
  10. Michael Snow 00:11, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  11. Clean track record. Fair-minded. Kingturtle 01:58, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  12. Yes! Jia ng 04:01, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  13. From what I see, support. Ilyanep 14:39, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  14. James F. (talk) 03:37, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  15. jengod 23:14, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
  16. Maybe now he'll buckle down to his real work and ditch that "schoolwork" come the fall. [[User:Meelar| Meelar (talk)]] 22:47, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  17. Lst 27 02:46, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  18. David Cannon 20:12, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC) A good candidate. Davodd had the good sense to decline nomination earlier when time constraints would have inhibited (in his eyes) his activity on Wikipedia; it's very good of him to offer his services now that he is able. Give it to him!

Oppose

Neutral

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Davodd

I've been an active member since November 2003, have a couple thousand edits under my belt and have been in the community long enough to understand the integral nature of Wikiquette and the NPOV policy in maintaining credibility and sustainability of this project. Although I turned down a previous suggestion of admin nomination in the past because of time obligations (full time school and full time work), I now have the time - and thorough understanding - of the WP community to be a good admin. Also, since I declined nomination in the past, think it is cheesy for me to ask someone to nominate me now - so I'm sticking my own neck out. Still, if there is a collective "no" to this self-nomination, I understand. I can still do 99% of what I want to do the old-fashioned way and have faith in the current batch of admins. Davodd 22:00, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)

Davodd has made 3,698 edits as of 12 June 2004. -- "DICK" CHENEY 22:48, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support

  1. A worthy candidate who would have had this earlier had he succumbed to peer pressure more readily. ;-) Glad to see him ready to take on the glory and tedium that is being an admin. Jwrosenzweig 22:46, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  2. Support -- "DICK" CHENEY 22:48, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  3. Good contributions, deals with minor disagreements coolly. moink 22:51, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  4. Merovingian Talk 23:06, Jun 21, 2004 (UTC)
  5. BCorr| Брайен 23:45, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  6. older wiser 00:40, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  7. JCarriker 02:20, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC) Has a great respect for community consensus; made great proposals at WikiProject U.S. Regions.
  8. Cecropia | Talk 03:39, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  9. Acegikmo1 23:46, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)
  10. Michael Snow 00:11, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  11. Clean track record. Fair-minded. Kingturtle 01:58, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  12. Yes! Jia ng 04:01, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  13. From what I see, support. Ilyanep 14:39, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  14. James F. (talk) 03:37, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  15. jengod 23:14, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
  16. Maybe now he'll buckle down to his real work and ditch that "schoolwork" come the fall. [[User:Meelar| Meelar (talk)]] 22:47, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  17. Lst 27 02:46, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  18. David Cannon 20:12, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC) A good candidate. Davodd had the good sense to decline nomination earlier when time constraints would have inhibited (in his eyes) his activity on Wikipedia; it's very good of him to offer his services now that he is able. Give it to him!

Oppose

Neutral


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook