(55/38/12); Scheduled to end 17:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Withdrawn by candidate.
Ctjf83 ( talk · contribs) – I've been on Wikipedia for almost 4.5 years and have nearly 40,000 edits. I have much improved from my last RfA. I participate more in WP:AfDs and don't create userboxes or make any edits which violate WP:BLP. Those were the main 2 reasons I failed nearly 3 years ago. Also, I think a pretty important point, my opinion on IPs and new users has greatly improved, especially with in the last year. I now realize and acknowledge that IPs and new users do a number of great contributions and vastly improve Wikipedia. So much so, that I have requested my talk page not be protected/be unprotected (due to vandalism) so that legit IPs and new users may query me on my talk page. I think I am ready for the tools this time. CTJF83 chat 17:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Questions from The Utahraptor
Optional question from Reaper Eternal ( talk)
Optional question from Likeminas
Optional question from 28bytes
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
This doesn't mean I could never support you (and I still think Keepscases' oppose was frivolous—as far as I'm concerned your userpage is a place for you to express your identity however you wish). What it does mean is that I oppose you gaining the tools until I see considerably more evidence of careful, thoughtful AfD closes after the full period of discussion.— S Marshall T/ C 03:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If there were any reasonable way to get rid of a bad admin, then I would be much more prone to a "support" position. (Well, actually, if there were any reasonable way to get rid of a bad admin then the first thing I'd do would be to nominate a dozen people for tool-removal. But after that I'd be much more prone to support.)— S Marshall T/ C 11:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
(55/38/12); Scheduled to end 17:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Withdrawn by candidate.
Ctjf83 ( talk · contribs) – I've been on Wikipedia for almost 4.5 years and have nearly 40,000 edits. I have much improved from my last RfA. I participate more in WP:AfDs and don't create userboxes or make any edits which violate WP:BLP. Those were the main 2 reasons I failed nearly 3 years ago. Also, I think a pretty important point, my opinion on IPs and new users has greatly improved, especially with in the last year. I now realize and acknowledge that IPs and new users do a number of great contributions and vastly improve Wikipedia. So much so, that I have requested my talk page not be protected/be unprotected (due to vandalism) so that legit IPs and new users may query me on my talk page. I think I am ready for the tools this time. CTJF83 chat 17:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Questions from The Utahraptor
Optional question from Reaper Eternal ( talk)
Optional question from Likeminas
Optional question from 28bytes
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
This doesn't mean I could never support you (and I still think Keepscases' oppose was frivolous—as far as I'm concerned your userpage is a place for you to express your identity however you wish). What it does mean is that I oppose you gaining the tools until I see considerably more evidence of careful, thoughtful AfD closes after the full period of discussion.— S Marshall T/ C 03:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
If there were any reasonable way to get rid of a bad admin, then I would be much more prone to a "support" position. (Well, actually, if there were any reasonable way to get rid of a bad admin then the first thing I'd do would be to nominate a dozen people for tool-removal. But after that I'd be much more prone to support.)— S Marshall T/ C 11:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply