The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This poll has been closed, because it does not follow the polling guidelines
Important: Please read the talk page first, which holds discussion. This is a pure poll. Keep discussion of the issue on the talk page. This page is the poll, the talk page is discussion. Based on the numbers, and more importantly the discussion on the talk page, we should be able to gain consensus on whether changes to RfA and Durin's method of making them are supported.
This refers to the way changes made on Moralis' and Matt Britt's RfAs. This does not ask if you support the changes. It asks if you believe testing new methods should continue this way.
Note: This question does not ask if the results of an experimental RfA is binding. Bureaucrats are charged with and expected to evaluate consensus. If, given an experimental format they can not, it is reasonable to expect they would return the RfA is incapable of evaluating consensus and thus close as such. I note that the Moralis RfA was closed by User:Warofdreams without too much trouble. I expect that there may be considerable difficulty in closing the Matt Britt RfA and if so the bureaucrats should return it as unable to close.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This poll has been closed, because it does not follow the polling guidelines
Important: Please read the talk page first, which holds discussion. This is a pure poll. Keep discussion of the issue on the talk page. This page is the poll, the talk page is discussion. Based on the numbers, and more importantly the discussion on the talk page, we should be able to gain consensus on whether changes to RfA and Durin's method of making them are supported.
This refers to the way changes made on Moralis' and Matt Britt's RfAs. This does not ask if you support the changes. It asks if you believe testing new methods should continue this way.
Note: This question does not ask if the results of an experimental RfA is binding. Bureaucrats are charged with and expected to evaluate consensus. If, given an experimental format they can not, it is reasonable to expect they would return the RfA is incapable of evaluating consensus and thus close as such. I note that the Moralis RfA was closed by User:Warofdreams without too much trouble. I expect that there may be considerable difficulty in closing the Matt Britt RfA and if so the bureaucrats should return it as unable to close.