See original
- User:Alex756 has been with us since April 2003 and has made over 2000 edits, often making our law-related articles more professional and accurate. Obviously not a red-eyed blood-sucking lawyer we have here! :-) He had been nominated by LittleDan months ago, and supported by mav. One assumes that they still support him, since Alex756 has not villify as far as I can detect with my vice-sensor. A prolific writer with specific insights into what exactly is lawful or not like him would make him an ideal administrator. -- Menchi 06:26, Aug 23, 2003 (UTC)
- I accept the nomination — as I previously did on the mailing list in May — promise not to be heavyhanded in use of admin. powers; remind everyone that lawyers have a natural (is that nurture or nature?!) tendency to disagree (especially on legal positions) as legal cultures have their own NPOV approaches to documenting such differing points of view; and, finally, that nothing I post on Wikipedia is legal advice, just general legal information or my reflections on various legal questions that are presented to this cooperative community for consensus review. I try not to be one of those generally disagreeable lawyers, — I believe compromise and cooperation are essential to any social system. Thank you for the nominations. Alex756 15:46, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)
- Another vote of support. Though I must say your acceptance post just above this looks vaguely like something a lawyer might write. :) --
Delirium 00:01, Aug 26, 2003 (UTC)
- Make it so! -- mav 22:54, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
See original
- User:Alex756 has been with us since April 2003 and has made over 2000 edits, often making our law-related articles more professional and accurate. Obviously not a red-eyed blood-sucking lawyer we have here! :-) He had been nominated by LittleDan months ago, and supported by mav. One assumes that they still support him, since Alex756 has not villify as far as I can detect with my vice-sensor. A prolific writer with specific insights into what exactly is lawful or not like him would make him an ideal administrator. -- Menchi 06:26, Aug 23, 2003 (UTC)
- I accept the nomination — as I previously did on the mailing list in May — promise not to be heavyhanded in use of admin. powers; remind everyone that lawyers have a natural (is that nurture or nature?!) tendency to disagree (especially on legal positions) as legal cultures have their own NPOV approaches to documenting such differing points of view; and, finally, that nothing I post on Wikipedia is legal advice, just general legal information or my reflections on various legal questions that are presented to this cooperative community for consensus review. I try not to be one of those generally disagreeable lawyers, — I believe compromise and cooperation are essential to any social system. Thank you for the nominations. Alex756 15:46, 24 Aug 2003 (UTC)
- Another vote of support. Though I must say your acceptance post just above this looks vaguely like something a lawyer might write. :) --
Delirium 00:01, Aug 26, 2003 (UTC)
- Make it so! -- mav 22:54, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)