This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 11, 2024.
Drew Dixon
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
"Family member of article subject" for a person not named in the target article at all. Sharon Pratt Kelly does have a daughter named Drew Dixon, but the sum total of her presence in her mother's article amounts to "[Pratt and her husband] have two daughters", without naming either of them. The other problems here are that (a) as a former executive for a record label, Drew Dixon is likely independently notable enough to have her own separate article, rather than just being a redirect, and (b) Drew Dixon is also the nom de porn of a contemporary porn performer who is very much not Sharon Pratt Kelly's daughter -- and while I can't speak with any authority as to whether the porn actor would pass notability criteria for porn actors or not, he's at the very least a plausible enough search term that a reader might think we're saying he's related to Sharon Pratt Kelly (which he's not) if the article fails to contexualize that the topic intended by the redirect is a black female entertainment industry executive rather than a white male porn actor. So because the daughter/executive is almost certainly notable enough for her own article, and the porn guy may or may not be but is absolutely semi-famous enough to create confusion regardless, this probably should be a redlink, an article or a disambiguation page rather than a redirect.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as ambiguous without enough content for a disambig page. Jay 💬 16:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Sociocultural
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Is this target really appropriate for such a general word? I am thinking a soft redirect to Wikidata could be better.
Super Dromaeosaurus (
talk) 16:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Leaning towards soft redirect, but not yet set on one target. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Complex/Rational 21:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
U-S-A!. Jay 💬 13:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Unlikely search term and unhelpful phonetically due to ambiguity with USI. Further we don't need redirects from every combination of letters that might potentially phonetically indicate a target, I suggest deletion.
2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:7D1A:B8FA:44E3:217 (
talk) 20:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, this is how to pronounce "USA", since "Ay" is the name of the letter "A".
176.33.241.125 (
talk) 01:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per above, and based on my good results not ambiguous with anything.
Thryduulf (
talk) 22:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC) See below the relist.
Thryduulf (
talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete would not be used as a search term to learn about the United States. Typing this in probably would be wanting something about the chant "U S A!" where the phonetics are important but even that is a streeetch, although definitely more reasonable to me than going to the generic United States page, which would warrant a generic search term. Utopes(talk / cont) 06:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Ope, there is actually an article for that. Updating to a Strong Retarget to
U-S-A! (or weak retarget to
USA (disambiguation)), as the phonetics are the core of the chant's article and the only reason they'd be typed in full, in my opinion. Maybe hatnote too. Alternatively, hatnote "
U S A" instead as its already a redirect there. Utopes(talk / cont) 06:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! per Utopes. I agree this is the most likely desired target. It already has a hatnote to
USA (disambiguation) and a link to
United States of America in case someone wasn't looking for the chant.
A7V2 (
talk) 22:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or retarget? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
🌺 Cremastra (
talk) 17:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! per above. Not sure how I failed to spot that article but it is indeed the better target.
Thryduulf (
talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! per above. --
Cyfal (
talk) 18:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! since it is the common spelling of the pronunciation of the letters that make up the acronym for the United States.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment (redirect creator) I'm also fine with it being re-targetted to
U-S-A!.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 12:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The Rock-afire exsplosion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 00:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Implausible redirect, so I suggest deletion.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 15:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete because of the unlikely misspelling of explosion. If kept, though, it should be retargeted to
The Rock-afire Explosion. -
Eureka Lott 16:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, unlikely and unneeded misspelling of "explosion". Utopes(talk / cont) 19:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as an unlikely misspelling. As Eureka Lott points out, it should be retargeted if kept.
Meters (
talk) 21:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - the redirect had been targeted at The Rock-afire Explosion in 2005, but it was changed to Showbiz Pizza when Rock A-Fire redirected to that page before being seperated.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 23:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
This is not a necessary redirect or an unlikely misspelling. I agree with everyone above.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 23:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per above rationale, particularly from EurekaLott. --
GoneIn60 (
talk) 12:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Chucky cheese's
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: seem very plausible to me.
Meters (
talk) 21:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Chuck e cheese's
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong keep as it is phonetically incorrect in a minor way and correct in a major way as per Cremastra's suggestion.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Chuck E. Cheez
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong keep as per the reply I said above in the nearly-same spelling correction.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
England YYYY (Association football event) redirects
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participation was limited even after multiple relists. Jay 💬 16:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep "England 2022" - sports events are known by their country-year shorthand name, and this was the only major football event to take place in England in 2022. Like other redirects of the same format, this should be kept, it's not ambiguous in the sense that nobody will mistake it (especially disambiguated with "association football event", emphasis mine) for any generic match. Create disambiguation for "England 2021" - even though this event still has the England 2021 branding, it took place in 2022, while the Men's Euro 2020, which held most of its matches in England, in fact took place in 2021. Because of the possibility of confusing these similar events, the redirect should be turned into a disambiguation page.
Kingsif (
talk) 23:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Kingsif: "sports events are known by their country-year shorthand name" - I'm quite the sports focused editor and very active at redirect reviewing and this is not standard practice in my experience. You mentioned branding, do you have anything that supports "England 2022" as the branding used?
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
do you have anything that supports "England 2022" as the branding used? - the logo at the article in question, for one.
Kingsif (
talk) 23:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
That's only a portion of the logo, I did find "Euro England 2022" when looking prior to and after this nomination.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay, if you go to the UEFA website
for the Women's Euro, you will see that "UEFA Women's Euro" (the rest of the logo) is there by itself in the top corner. Hence, the branding for the event is what remains. Just going to also note that Euros also get called "Euro YEAR", which I have to assume is another redirect, but we're talking about this.
Trying to avoid the search results talking about England winning, there's e.g.
this headlineWill England 2022 be the best Women's Euros ever?. Useful redirect. IMO.
Kingsif (
talk) 00:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the links, I'll dig into it a bit more when I'm back on PC. The entry for the FA Cup is coming up for me when searching but that doesn't mean you're not correct that it was used as a common name for the event.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 00:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm quite the sports focused editor and very active at redirect reviewing and this is not standard practice in my experience. - that seems... nigh-impossible, unless you only edit sports that do not have international tournaments. I considered maybe North America does not use such names and that's your blind spot (not a reason to delete, just a reason you wouldn't know), but then I typed in the first event I thought of (Qatar 2022) in a private tab, and CNN (North American) was the second non-Wikipedia result (
A year on from Qatar 2022, what’s the legacy of a World Cup like no other?). It's how it is.
Kingsif (
talk) 23:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Definitely not a blind spot for me and I'd prefer you not jump to conclusions about me. On my phone England 2022 actually brought up results for the 2022 FIFA World Cup.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Didn't jump to conclusions, and I referred to a continent, not you, with one of the possibilities I considered. Good chat, man. Well, no. If you're trying to suggest that people would search "England 2022" to find out about Qatar 2022, I don't know if you're being facetious or you want to continue trying to deny the shorthand name's existence, but it's past the point of anything needed to be said.
Kingsif (
talk) 00:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I do not believe that England 2022 should refer to the Qatar 2022 World Cup, I was just mentioning that it brought me a lot more results about the World Cup and didn't bring me to the target article.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 00:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Noted. As for the RfD, I don't think that excludes it from being a relevant and useful redirect. Keeping the redirect might be helpful, in fact.
Kingsif (
talk) 00:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak keep "England 2022" per Kingsif. Delete "England 2021" The event was still called "Euro 2020," so I doubt this is a likely search term. England was also not mentioned on the logo like for the women's event. -
Presidentmantalk ·
contribs (
Talkback) 00:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A7V2: Thanks again for closing that. I meant to undo that edit/nomination after Twinkle created the nomination while I was trying to fix this nomination, but apparently I totally forgot to undo the duplicate nomination afterwards. (I have no opinion regarding these redirects.)
Steel1943 (
talk) 14:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --
BDD (
talk) 19:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Any further thoughts? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 09:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
I Wanna Be the Boshy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No mention of fan game at all at target following section removal in 2023. (
diff)
Jalen Folf(talk) 08:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, no mention makes these unhelpful. Utopes(talk / cont) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete due to the lack of mentioning, as said in the reason via Utopes and the one above that.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The mention has been restored to the article with a
WP:RS mentioning it. It's now a believable search target, therefore it should remain as-is.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 17:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep with the mention added by Zxcvbnm. Jay 💬 13:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
LINE Bank
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Because
Z Holdings was merged into
LY Corporation, now LINE Bank is a service of LY. As such, LINE Bank should be retargeted to
LY Corporation to keep up with the times. 三葉草SanYeCao 06:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect (Recorrect) to
LY Corporation. The reasoning is said above. If anyone disagrees with me, reply to me as to why. If anyone agrees, thank you.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
For fairness, I have notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets. Jay 💬 13:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for adding the notifications, which informed me of this discussion.
Cunard (
talk) 08:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Moreau (artist)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The current target is seen as the primary topic. Jay 💬 13:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I redirected the page to
Moreau (surname) but was reverted. There are a number of artists at the target destination but another editor believes it's not ambiguous. Keep target or change?
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to the surname list per
WP:INCDAB. I removed many unsourced redlinks from that list but there are still multiple artists there. There are no article-space incoming links so retargeting does not cause problems. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 21:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per Presidentman. The historically significant Gustave has preeminence among the Moreau artists, and not everyone will type the entire name in when searching for his page.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 10:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or retarget? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 05:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per above but add a hatnote to the dab page.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep the redirection, but actually redirect it to a disambiguation page. If anyone reverts it, make sure to remember that everyone has a different first name but also a different surname and last name.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
StaleGuy22: Based on your comment, you meant to vote "Retarget" instead of "Keep".
Hey man im josh (
talk) 16:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Gustave Moreau is the primary topic for artists called Moreau – see the
ngram results for the four artists named above – so I don't think
WP:INCDAB does apply. Dividing
Moreau (surname) into sections, with one for artists, would be a good idea.
Ham II (
talk) 21:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 04:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Another set of redirects for a different letter block, now that 10 February has past. This nomination contains the set of titles starting from G to O. All of which are missing the closing parentheses, have zero pageviews evident from massviews, no substantial history, and can't be easily fixed by a move, due to overlapping titles and/or otherwise. Utopes(talk / cont) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I disagree that they are implausible and therefore of no use: For myself, when typing a search i often stop when i see something useful come up in the box and then click on that; any of these redirects would in that case be useful. Nevertheless, while they aren't hurting the project, i don't see a lot of benefit from them, so certainly do not object to deletion. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 09:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all looks like this is when copy and paste goes wrong leaving out the closed bracket really need to read fully before submited.
Delete all - Can confirm that my redirect was a typo. Cards84664 14:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all - These redirect solve a problem with
Markdown on other websites, but that's a problem that should be solved on those websites, not here. -
UtherSRG(talk) 14:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking at the edit summaries when the name changes were made on 00:52 and 00:56, 29 October 2021 by an editor who has since been blocked (on 01:24, 13 November 2021), I think the motivation was that the editor didn't know how to disambiguate properly, and accidentally forgot the second parenthesis. When I changed NISS to NISS (Sudan) on 21:32, 29 January 2020, I seem to remember that a disambig page was not (yet) justified. Now it is justified, with at least two currently named agencies of that name and one that has been renamed (like the Russian KGB became the FSB, though the Belarusian KGB is still the KGB). I've created
National Intelligence and Security Service (disambiguation). I haven't checked policy about redirects with syntax errors. I don't see any loss in navigability if the National Intelligence and Security Service (Ethiopia redirect is deleted.
Boud (
talk) 17:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Obvious typos. Won't be missed as search terms.
Pichpich (
talk) 18:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Looking at the edit summary at time of creation, I created
Glen Rock (boulder because I kept making that exact typo. I imagine that many of those with an opening parenthesis and not a closing parenthesis were created for similar reasons. Seems reasonable. —
Red-tailed hawk(nest) 22:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all per comments above since starting with a parenthesis and ending without one is not rare but very uncommon.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 18:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Pine Mountain (Wells, New York 2)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 04:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Not a useful redirect due to the subjective number for differentiation. The articles themselves do not identify as "Pine Mountain". Had some linkage that has now been removed. Utopes(talk / cont) 03:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
29600 Ford Avenue
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 LizRead!Talk! 02:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
14701 Rinaldi Street
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Via CSD G7. Thank you BD2412 for taking care of these.
(non-admin closure)Utopes(talk / cont) 02:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Stupidest redirect I have created, unnecessary and looking to speedydelete. Created numerous address redirects but I can't list all of them
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 02:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
You don't have to list all your stupid redirects. All you need to do is put
Template:Db-g7 on each. And then please stop creating more stupid redirects. --
Hoary (
talk) 02:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Intitally because of a YT video, but it's stupid to create.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 02:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I've tagged both of these listed here for G7 speedy deletion, but are you saying here that you'd like to delete all of the Kmart addresses that you created today? Utopes(talk / cont) 02:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
GabrielPenn4223: (I've seen your edits at the teahouse, but let me know here if you want me to tag the Kmart addresses and I'll go ahead, unless there are any that you'd like to keep.) Utopes(talk / cont) 02:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Tag all for deletion, but probably research for any notable ones that are plausable search terms.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 02:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
GabrielPenn4223, they are your content creation, you tag them for CSD G7 (use
WP:TWINKLE) if you are the only or major contributor. LizRead!Talk! 02:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I have gone ahead and deleted the lot.
BD2412T 02:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 11, 2024.
Drew Dixon
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
"Family member of article subject" for a person not named in the target article at all. Sharon Pratt Kelly does have a daughter named Drew Dixon, but the sum total of her presence in her mother's article amounts to "[Pratt and her husband] have two daughters", without naming either of them. The other problems here are that (a) as a former executive for a record label, Drew Dixon is likely independently notable enough to have her own separate article, rather than just being a redirect, and (b) Drew Dixon is also the nom de porn of a contemporary porn performer who is very much not Sharon Pratt Kelly's daughter -- and while I can't speak with any authority as to whether the porn actor would pass notability criteria for porn actors or not, he's at the very least a plausible enough search term that a reader might think we're saying he's related to Sharon Pratt Kelly (which he's not) if the article fails to contexualize that the topic intended by the redirect is a black female entertainment industry executive rather than a white male porn actor. So because the daughter/executive is almost certainly notable enough for her own article, and the porn guy may or may not be but is absolutely semi-famous enough to create confusion regardless, this probably should be a redlink, an article or a disambiguation page rather than a redirect.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as ambiguous without enough content for a disambig page. Jay 💬 16:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Sociocultural
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Is this target really appropriate for such a general word? I am thinking a soft redirect to Wikidata could be better.
Super Dromaeosaurus (
talk) 16:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Leaning towards soft redirect, but not yet set on one target. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Complex/Rational 21:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
U-S-A!. Jay 💬 13:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Unlikely search term and unhelpful phonetically due to ambiguity with USI. Further we don't need redirects from every combination of letters that might potentially phonetically indicate a target, I suggest deletion.
2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:7D1A:B8FA:44E3:217 (
talk) 20:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep, this is how to pronounce "USA", since "Ay" is the name of the letter "A".
176.33.241.125 (
talk) 01:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per above, and based on my good results not ambiguous with anything.
Thryduulf (
talk) 22:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC) See below the relist.
Thryduulf (
talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete would not be used as a search term to learn about the United States. Typing this in probably would be wanting something about the chant "U S A!" where the phonetics are important but even that is a streeetch, although definitely more reasonable to me than going to the generic United States page, which would warrant a generic search term. Utopes(talk / cont) 06:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Ope, there is actually an article for that. Updating to a Strong Retarget to
U-S-A! (or weak retarget to
USA (disambiguation)), as the phonetics are the core of the chant's article and the only reason they'd be typed in full, in my opinion. Maybe hatnote too. Alternatively, hatnote "
U S A" instead as its already a redirect there. Utopes(talk / cont) 06:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! per Utopes. I agree this is the most likely desired target. It already has a hatnote to
USA (disambiguation) and a link to
United States of America in case someone wasn't looking for the chant.
A7V2 (
talk) 22:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or retarget? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
🌺 Cremastra (
talk) 17:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! per above. Not sure how I failed to spot that article but it is indeed the better target.
Thryduulf (
talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! per above. --
Cyfal (
talk) 18:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
U-S-A! since it is the common spelling of the pronunciation of the letters that make up the acronym for the United States.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment (redirect creator) I'm also fine with it being re-targetted to
U-S-A!.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 12:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The Rock-afire exsplosion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 00:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Implausible redirect, so I suggest deletion.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 15:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete because of the unlikely misspelling of explosion. If kept, though, it should be retargeted to
The Rock-afire Explosion. -
Eureka Lott 16:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, unlikely and unneeded misspelling of "explosion". Utopes(talk / cont) 19:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as an unlikely misspelling. As Eureka Lott points out, it should be retargeted if kept.
Meters (
talk) 21:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - the redirect had been targeted at The Rock-afire Explosion in 2005, but it was changed to Showbiz Pizza when Rock A-Fire redirected to that page before being seperated.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 23:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
This is not a necessary redirect or an unlikely misspelling. I agree with everyone above.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 23:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per above rationale, particularly from EurekaLott. --
GoneIn60 (
talk) 12:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Chucky cheese's
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: seem very plausible to me.
Meters (
talk) 21:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Chuck e cheese's
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong keep as it is phonetically incorrect in a minor way and correct in a major way as per Cremastra's suggestion.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Chuck E. Cheez
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Strong keep as per the reply I said above in the nearly-same spelling correction.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
England YYYY (Association football event) redirects
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participation was limited even after multiple relists. Jay 💬 16:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep "England 2022" - sports events are known by their country-year shorthand name, and this was the only major football event to take place in England in 2022. Like other redirects of the same format, this should be kept, it's not ambiguous in the sense that nobody will mistake it (especially disambiguated with "association football event", emphasis mine) for any generic match. Create disambiguation for "England 2021" - even though this event still has the England 2021 branding, it took place in 2022, while the Men's Euro 2020, which held most of its matches in England, in fact took place in 2021. Because of the possibility of confusing these similar events, the redirect should be turned into a disambiguation page.
Kingsif (
talk) 23:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Kingsif: "sports events are known by their country-year shorthand name" - I'm quite the sports focused editor and very active at redirect reviewing and this is not standard practice in my experience. You mentioned branding, do you have anything that supports "England 2022" as the branding used?
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
do you have anything that supports "England 2022" as the branding used? - the logo at the article in question, for one.
Kingsif (
talk) 23:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
That's only a portion of the logo, I did find "Euro England 2022" when looking prior to and after this nomination.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay, if you go to the UEFA website
for the Women's Euro, you will see that "UEFA Women's Euro" (the rest of the logo) is there by itself in the top corner. Hence, the branding for the event is what remains. Just going to also note that Euros also get called "Euro YEAR", which I have to assume is another redirect, but we're talking about this.
Trying to avoid the search results talking about England winning, there's e.g.
this headlineWill England 2022 be the best Women's Euros ever?. Useful redirect. IMO.
Kingsif (
talk) 00:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the links, I'll dig into it a bit more when I'm back on PC. The entry for the FA Cup is coming up for me when searching but that doesn't mean you're not correct that it was used as a common name for the event.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 00:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm quite the sports focused editor and very active at redirect reviewing and this is not standard practice in my experience. - that seems... nigh-impossible, unless you only edit sports that do not have international tournaments. I considered maybe North America does not use such names and that's your blind spot (not a reason to delete, just a reason you wouldn't know), but then I typed in the first event I thought of (Qatar 2022) in a private tab, and CNN (North American) was the second non-Wikipedia result (
A year on from Qatar 2022, what’s the legacy of a World Cup like no other?). It's how it is.
Kingsif (
talk) 23:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Definitely not a blind spot for me and I'd prefer you not jump to conclusions about me. On my phone England 2022 actually brought up results for the 2022 FIFA World Cup.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 23:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Didn't jump to conclusions, and I referred to a continent, not you, with one of the possibilities I considered. Good chat, man. Well, no. If you're trying to suggest that people would search "England 2022" to find out about Qatar 2022, I don't know if you're being facetious or you want to continue trying to deny the shorthand name's existence, but it's past the point of anything needed to be said.
Kingsif (
talk) 00:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
I do not believe that England 2022 should refer to the Qatar 2022 World Cup, I was just mentioning that it brought me a lot more results about the World Cup and didn't bring me to the target article.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 00:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Noted. As for the RfD, I don't think that excludes it from being a relevant and useful redirect. Keeping the redirect might be helpful, in fact.
Kingsif (
talk) 00:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Weak keep "England 2022" per Kingsif. Delete "England 2021" The event was still called "Euro 2020," so I doubt this is a likely search term. England was also not mentioned on the logo like for the women's event. -
Presidentmantalk ·
contribs (
Talkback) 00:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
A7V2: Thanks again for closing that. I meant to undo that edit/nomination after Twinkle created the nomination while I was trying to fix this nomination, but apparently I totally forgot to undo the duplicate nomination afterwards. (I have no opinion regarding these redirects.)
Steel1943 (
talk) 14:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --
BDD (
talk) 19:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Any further thoughts? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 09:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
I Wanna Be the Boshy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No mention of fan game at all at target following section removal in 2023. (
diff)
Jalen Folf(talk) 08:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, no mention makes these unhelpful. Utopes(talk / cont) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete due to the lack of mentioning, as said in the reason via Utopes and the one above that.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The mention has been restored to the article with a
WP:RS mentioning it. It's now a believable search target, therefore it should remain as-is.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 17:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep with the mention added by Zxcvbnm. Jay 💬 13:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
LINE Bank
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Because
Z Holdings was merged into
LY Corporation, now LINE Bank is a service of LY. As such, LINE Bank should be retargeted to
LY Corporation to keep up with the times. 三葉草SanYeCao 06:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect (Recorrect) to
LY Corporation. The reasoning is said above. If anyone disagrees with me, reply to me as to why. If anyone agrees, thank you.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
For fairness, I have notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets. Jay 💬 13:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you for adding the notifications, which informed me of this discussion.
Cunard (
talk) 08:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Moreau (artist)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The current target is seen as the primary topic. Jay 💬 13:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I redirected the page to
Moreau (surname) but was reverted. There are a number of artists at the target destination but another editor believes it's not ambiguous. Keep target or change?
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Retarget to the surname list per
WP:INCDAB. I removed many unsourced redlinks from that list but there are still multiple artists there. There are no article-space incoming links so retargeting does not cause problems. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 21:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per Presidentman. The historically significant Gustave has preeminence among the Moreau artists, and not everyone will type the entire name in when searching for his page.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 10:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or retarget? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 05:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per above but add a hatnote to the dab page.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep the redirection, but actually redirect it to a disambiguation page. If anyone reverts it, make sure to remember that everyone has a different first name but also a different surname and last name.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
StaleGuy22: Based on your comment, you meant to vote "Retarget" instead of "Keep".
Hey man im josh (
talk) 16:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Gustave Moreau is the primary topic for artists called Moreau – see the
ngram results for the four artists named above – so I don't think
WP:INCDAB does apply. Dividing
Moreau (surname) into sections, with one for artists, would be a good idea.
Ham II (
talk) 21:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 04:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Another set of redirects for a different letter block, now that 10 February has past. This nomination contains the set of titles starting from G to O. All of which are missing the closing parentheses, have zero pageviews evident from massviews, no substantial history, and can't be easily fixed by a move, due to overlapping titles and/or otherwise. Utopes(talk / cont) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I disagree that they are implausible and therefore of no use: For myself, when typing a search i often stop when i see something useful come up in the box and then click on that; any of these redirects would in that case be useful. Nevertheless, while they aren't hurting the project, i don't see a lot of benefit from them, so certainly do not object to deletion. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 09:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all looks like this is when copy and paste goes wrong leaving out the closed bracket really need to read fully before submited.
Delete all - Can confirm that my redirect was a typo. Cards84664 14:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all - These redirect solve a problem with
Markdown on other websites, but that's a problem that should be solved on those websites, not here. -
UtherSRG(talk) 14:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Looking at the edit summaries when the name changes were made on 00:52 and 00:56, 29 October 2021 by an editor who has since been blocked (on 01:24, 13 November 2021), I think the motivation was that the editor didn't know how to disambiguate properly, and accidentally forgot the second parenthesis. When I changed NISS to NISS (Sudan) on 21:32, 29 January 2020, I seem to remember that a disambig page was not (yet) justified. Now it is justified, with at least two currently named agencies of that name and one that has been renamed (like the Russian KGB became the FSB, though the Belarusian KGB is still the KGB). I've created
National Intelligence and Security Service (disambiguation). I haven't checked policy about redirects with syntax errors. I don't see any loss in navigability if the National Intelligence and Security Service (Ethiopia redirect is deleted.
Boud (
talk) 17:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all. Obvious typos. Won't be missed as search terms.
Pichpich (
talk) 18:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Looking at the edit summary at time of creation, I created
Glen Rock (boulder because I kept making that exact typo. I imagine that many of those with an opening parenthesis and not a closing parenthesis were created for similar reasons. Seems reasonable. —
Red-tailed hawk(nest) 22:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all per comments above since starting with a parenthesis and ending without one is not rare but very uncommon.
StaleGuy22 (
talk) 18:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Pine Mountain (Wells, New York 2)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 04:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Not a useful redirect due to the subjective number for differentiation. The articles themselves do not identify as "Pine Mountain". Had some linkage that has now been removed. Utopes(talk / cont) 03:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
29600 Ford Avenue
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 LizRead!Talk! 02:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
14701 Rinaldi Street
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Via CSD G7. Thank you BD2412 for taking care of these.
(non-admin closure)Utopes(talk / cont) 02:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Stupidest redirect I have created, unnecessary and looking to speedydelete. Created numerous address redirects but I can't list all of them
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 02:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
You don't have to list all your stupid redirects. All you need to do is put
Template:Db-g7 on each. And then please stop creating more stupid redirects. --
Hoary (
talk) 02:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Intitally because of a YT video, but it's stupid to create.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 02:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I've tagged both of these listed here for G7 speedy deletion, but are you saying here that you'd like to delete all of the Kmart addresses that you created today? Utopes(talk / cont) 02:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
GabrielPenn4223: (I've seen your edits at the teahouse, but let me know here if you want me to tag the Kmart addresses and I'll go ahead, unless there are any that you'd like to keep.) Utopes(talk / cont) 02:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Tag all for deletion, but probably research for any notable ones that are plausable search terms.
GabrielPenn4223 (
talk) 02:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
GabrielPenn4223, they are your content creation, you tag them for CSD G7 (use
WP:TWINKLE) if you are the only or major contributor. LizRead!Talk! 02:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I have gone ahead and deleted the lot.
BD2412T 02:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).