This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 1, 2018.
Brimstone (sulfur)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 22:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Implausible search term, given that
Brimstone already exists as a disambiguation page that lists sulfur as the primary topic.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk) 17:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Killiondude (
talk) 19:22, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as implausible search term. People will either look for just brimstone or just sulphur.
PriceDL (
talk) 00:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - I don't really see this as being helpful.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 11:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Emerico de Hungría (santo)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Tone 09:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
FORRED; absolutely no reason for Spanish language redirects. Spanish has nothing to do with medieval Eastern Europe.
Surtsicna (
talk) 19:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Keep: Spanish has nothing to do with medieval Eastern Europe...hmm...
Bosley John Bosley (
talk) 20:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Could you, as the creator of these redirects, please explain what you mean by "hmm"?
Surtsicna (
talk) 20:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
Hum (sound), a wordless vocalization
Bosley John Bosley (
talk) 21:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- So, you have no argument at all in favor of keeping these redirects. Noted.
Surtsicna (
talk)
- I no not contest or other action if tackled in an objective manner:
Wikipedia: Policy on Spanish Language? I have raised an issue on the FORRED (
WP:explanatory supplement) page.
Bosley John Bosley (
talk) 13:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Weak Keep: Person searching for a saint would most probably search the saint in one of the the popular titles/names, so a redirect would help him land on the right page. Though I dont know if this is a reason enough to create a redirect. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ScitDei (
talk •
contribs)
- What? In what universe is "Emerico de Hungría (santo)" a popular English name for the Hungarian saint? It's not even popular in Spanish!
Surtsicna (
talk) 15:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
"Emerico de Hungría (santo)". If you then click the side bar it will take you to
Saint Emeric of Hungary...If you then click
Español it will take you back to the Spanish version.
Bosley John Bosley (
talk) 16:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:RFOREIGN. There's no relation between the subject and the Spanish language, so there's no reason for someone to search in this manner. --
Tavix (
talk) 02:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Killiondude (
talk) 19:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Jeez...It is not strictly necessary to discuss changes or to obtain written documentation of a consensus in advance...can
you idiots not see the
grammatical error in your reverts?
Bosley John Bosley (
talk) 20:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- It's not strictly necessary because of
WP:BOLD. However, when you have been reverted, like you have been several times now, consensus for your change is
required. Additionally, if you want to fix a grammar error, it's best to simply fix the grammar rather than removing the entire sentence. --
Tavix (
talk) 20:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Commercially released independent game
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 06:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Such a subject is not exclusive to
Dreamcast games.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:35, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Delete – presumably refers to
indie games, though it's a bit of a long-winded search term for them.
PriceDL (
talk) 00:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
GOAT Store
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 9#GOAT Store
Midwest Gaming Classic 2013
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
No information about these years is present at the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Service Games: Rise & Fall of SEGA
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
This phrase isn't mentioned in the target article. Otherwise, it looks like the name of a news article, book, or opinion piece.
Steel1943 (
talk) 16:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete it probably is supposed to be a book title, missing a "the" (
OCLC
966067697, a self-published essay collection).
WP:UNDUE to mention that book at the target; don't see anywhere else it would fit either (none of the authors seem to have Wikipedia articles), and it doesn't look individually notable either.
59.149.124.29 (
talk) 02:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Added two other variations on the same title to the nomination.
59.149.124.29 (
talk) 02:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nick Lucero
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 06:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Delete. It's jarringly confusing (and
WP:UNDUE) to have
Nick Lucero redirect to someone else's bio, and Murphy's recent-ish touring band (which has never had a long-term stable lineup) is only one of several notable bands with which Lucero is associated (
Queens of the Stone Age,
Mob Research, and probably others). He's almost certainly independently notable, but no one's likely to create the article any time soon if it's not a red link. —
SMcCandlish
☏
¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 15:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. This redirect, for me anyway, doesn't seem to make any sense.
VibeScepter (
talk) 11:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
University Station (MTR proposed)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 07:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
This redirect is no longer correct, since
HKU station opened in 2014. Perhaps delete?
Jc86035 (
talk) 07:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Inaccurate redirect unused in mainspace and extremely unlikely to be used by readers.
James (
talk/
contribs) 13:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Lost Aurolithic Civilization
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. The target no longer exists, anyhow.
Killiondude (
talk) 07:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely search. Article itself is extremely fringe based upon selfpublished work.
Doug Weller
talk 07:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
迪士尼
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 07:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
This is just a transliteration of "Disney" into Chinese, so the MTR station is not necessarily an appropriate target (and there are also a Disney park and a
Disney Resort Station in Shanghai). Would it be appropriate to redirect this to
The Walt Disney Company, or should this be deleted?
Jc86035 (
talk) 07:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Delete as an inappropriate target
PriceDL (
talk) 14:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
甲山
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Restore {{
Chinese title disambiguation}} as was done
here
(non-admin closure)
Ben · Salvidrim!
✉ 15:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
There is nothing at the target called 甲山; meanwhile there are three other topics on Wikipedia called 甲山, none of which are transcribed as
Koyama. I
attempted to make this into a {{
Chinese title disambiguation}}, which is
what is usually done when multiple topics share the same name but with different transcriptions. However this was reverted, so I am bringing it here for discussion. I could see a case for deletion too, but not for keeping it as is.
59.149.124.29 (
talk) 06:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Support,
WP:TRANSLITERATE does not apply to Chinese title disambiguation pages.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk) 23:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Dabify per nom --
Lenticel (
talk) 01:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Support I am fine with keeping the separate disambiguation page for 甲山 (though it should include a link to the
Koyama disambiguation page since there are Japanese place names using 甲山 read as Kōyama: see
ja:甲山_(曖昧さ回避)). I would have appreciated this IP user explaining their argument in the original edit comment (which was not coherent) and/or making this argument on the talk page (or my talk page) before bringing it here.
Michitaro (
talk) 04:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Support making a dab.
WP:TRANSLITERATE shouldn't apply as a dab page is a navigational aid, not an article. —
Xezbeth (
talk) 14:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Angelo Pergolito
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk) 07:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
Delete. The redirect makes no sense as the page to which this redirect redirects does not actually mention Angelo Pergolito. Further, it's unlikely an article on Angelo Pergolito will ever come into being; one has already been AfD'ed and multiple
WP:BEFORE searches of Angelo Pergolito have failed to find anything other than proof he once existed.
Chetsford (
talk) 02:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nominator. There do not seem to be
WP:RS which mention Mr. Pergolito (best thing I could find is
[1], everything else is personal webpages and mirrors of the deleted Wikipedia articles). So there's no way to add content about him anywhere even as a mention on the
Jimmy Cavallo article, and hence we have nowhere to send readers.
59.149.124.29 (
talk) 05:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Candy Cane Lane, Cathedral City
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete as
WP:G7. All of these redirects were created by the nominator. --
Tavix (
talk) 16:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Delete, no incoming links, no mention on article.
117Avenue (
talk) 01:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete no mention in article
Chetsford (
talk) 02:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Note: four identical discussions have been bundled. --
Tavix (
talk) 16:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.