The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Unless I'm reading it wrong, the edit history pretty clearly states that this redirect was a result of a pagemove since that ship was never called "Former American Eagle." Given its youngness and the notes below that the dab target ships are likewise not referred that way, deletion is reasonable. (If only we had longer edit summaries back then... </sarcasm>) ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 13:57, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Former American Eagle (ship) → American Cruise Lines  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Rather confusing title. Possibly refers to the topic in the edit history if American Eagle (2000 ship), but the use of the word "former" is confusing at best. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete or weak retarget to American Eagle (disambiguation)#Ships which lists a number of American Eagle ships. American Eagle (ship) retargets to the dab page. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 20:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to American Eagle (disambiguation)#Ships, a completely routine outcome.  —  SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  04:16, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete. I see no evidence that any of those ships are known as "Former American Eagle". -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Verizon Hearst Media Partners. (non-admin closure) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 05:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Complex Media → Complex (magazine)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Complex Media Inc. → Complex (magazine)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The company produces other stuff, mostly online, e.g. Collider (website), resulting in undesirable outcomes like the infobox at that article listing Complex (the company) as the publisher, and the link going to a magazine's article, implying the website is a product of the magazine, but they are editorially unconnected in reality. The company itself is probably more notable than the magazine (which may be defunct), though possibly less so than Collider; the company is definitely more notable that various of its other properties about which we don't (and may never) have articles, like Trillera.com (whatever that is). Unfortunately, info about the company and its properties is being inappropriately WP:COATRACKed into Complex magazine's article. Complex Media should just redlink until an article is created.  —  SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:47, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Verizon Hearst Media Partners which lists the notable properties under Complex Media. That article can be beefed up anyway and spun off should it prove notable from its current parent. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 22:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Tavix's idea works for me.  —  SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  04:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Relist per Tavix Retarget to Verizon Hearst Media Partners per AngusWOOF. Not sure how stable that would be in the long term, since publishing companies are always selling various brands and whatnot between each other, but it should hold for now. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 06:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Shahram Dabiri Oskuei. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Shahram Dabiri → Blizzard Entertainment  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Should this name really redirect to Blizzard Entertainment when he is not mentioned at all in the target article? I think he should either redirect to the other Shahram Dabiri or be deleted entirely if he is non notable. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 12:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Shahram Dabiri Oskuei as first+middle name since that person seems to be more notable. Add hatnote to Blizzard instead since he is mentioned, although whether a list of key people like that is appropriate WP:ALUMNI? AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. No consensus just due to lack of input, otherwise leaning keep. Angus makes a compelling argument; see also wikt:head rhyme ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 13:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Head rhyme → Alliteration  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

A head rhyme is a form of alliteration, but there is no mention of it in the article, or apparently anywhere in Wikipedia (aside from a single mention in an article on a book about rhyming). Probably best to delete and let search results handle things. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 06:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep as useful [1] [2] and in the Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms [3] AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Tropical Storm Zeke(1992) → 1992 Pacific hurricane season  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

There is already an article named Tropical Storm Zeke (1992), so there is no reason to have a redirect with the same title, perhaps the user that created this redirect was probably not aware of the existence of the aforementioned article. CycloneYoris ( talk) 21:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete due to lack of space between the title and the disambiguator, considering that the proper title already exists. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete lack of space and unlikely typo, and correctly formatted title is available above. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - I agree. We can just get rid of this. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 17:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Characichnos → Grallator  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Per Ichnofacies, "Characichnos" and Grallator and not the same. (However, I'm unsure if the redirect should be deleted per WP:REDLINK or retargeted to Ichnofacies, considering that Ichnofacies has no incoming redirects.) Steel1943 ( talk) 21:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete Characichnos is both an ichnogenus and the name of the ichnofacies containing that genus. I don't think we need articles or redirects for each ichnofacies. I'd never heard of ichnofacies until now, but I gather it's similar to the concept of "syntaxa" in phytosociology; both are ecological assemblages of taxa whether fossil footprints or extant plants. Syntaxa receive names based on the dominant plant, but not spelled identically. E.g. "Parietarietea judaicae" is a syntaxon dominated by Parietaria judaica. We don't have articles on any syntaxa (as far as I'm aware) and we shouldn't have articles on ichnofacies, which have the additional complication of being identically spelled to a contained ichnogenus. Delete Characichnos; leave a red-link to encourage creation of an article on the ichnogenus. Plantdrew ( talk) 19:24, 21 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Chaos Blast → Sonic the Hedgehog  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 13:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. ~ Dissident93 ^{( talk)} 04:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete Seems to be a powerful attack in-universe. Obscure referene and might violate WP:GAMEGUIDE -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 00:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Refine/fix redirect to Sonic_the_Hedgehog#Chaos_Emeralds. This appears related to those items, and would at least be useful. The target broke the section header. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 15:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete this isn't really described in the article. Only Chaos Emerald, which is everywhere in the franchise article, would be a useful term. Chaos Control is only mentioned once. There is also a Chaos Beam / Chaos Shot in Dragon Ball. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Chaos Energy (Sonic the Hedgehog) → Sonic the Hedgehog  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

"Chaos Energy" is not mentioned in the article. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 13:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. ~ Dissident93 ^{( talk)} 04:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Refine/fix redirect to Sonic_the_Hedgehog#Chaos_Emeralds. This appears related to those items, and would at least be useful. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 15:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete this isn't really described in the article, not even a statement like "there are x types of energy in the game: Fire, Earth, Water, Air, Chaos". Only Chaos Emerald, which is everywhere in the franchise article, would be a useful term. Chaos Control is only mentioned once. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:13, 23 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• .DBC → MPQ (file format)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

.DBC is the name of several file formats, not mentioned at current target, couldn't find any appropriate target. Paradoctor ( talk) 00:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete A Google search yields sources revealing that .DBC is a file extension associated with Blizzard Entertainment, as is .MPQ. That explains the rationale behind this redirect's creation even if it doesn't justify its target or its continuing existence. If the MPQ article doesn't explain .DBC files, and no one is about to come up with text to cover it there, then the redirect is of no use, especially if .DBC has other referents, in which case MPQ and Blizzard Entertainment may both not be primary topics for ".DBC". Largoplazo ( talk) 03:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Note: DBC is listed at List_of_filename_extensions_(A–E)#D. There's a link to Visual FoxPro, where it is not mentioned. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 22:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Sonic (2018 film) → Sonic the Hedgehog  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Movie apparently premiers in 2019, making this misleading as a redirect. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 02:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Leaning keep on this one. Not everyone may know of the delay. They may search for it, or it's conceivable not all piped links are updated right away either. Sergecross73 msg me 04:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete - If the supposed movie is WP:TOOSOON, I feel the redirect for it should be as well. It could be reinstated when the movie is ready for an article. Red Phoenix ^talk 03:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 21:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Scarlet Classic → Rutgers University  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The word "Classic" is nowhere in the target article. Looks as though this title refers to a specific possibly annual sports match involving this university, but at the present time, the connection is unclear due to lack of coverage in the target article. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Its why I had created a redirect, not an article. I thought of leaving it down the line in case the thing becomes notable enough, given enough years. Artix Kreiger ( talk) 15:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

IMO, this title has more of a WP:REDLINK situation unless an appropriate place to mention the redirect (possibly in its own section or a section about sports) is added to the article. Then, the redirect can probably reasonably stay, and possibly even be tagged with {{ R with possibilities}}. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete refers to an e-sports event, which isn't covered by any of the university articles. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 21:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Steel1943 ( talk) 13:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Winter activity → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Activities in winter are not exclusive to sports. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep, although it may be better to move the article to "Winter activity" for clarification. The article does kind of cover other non-sport winter activities, including building snowmen and "winter activity" is bolded in the lede as if they are synonyms. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:03, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

  @ Tavix: "Winter activity" was bolded in the first line??? Wow, oops. @ AngusWOOF: Are you okay I withdraw this? Steel1943 ( talk) 18:10, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

  Since 6 October 2016, the same date the redirect was created actually. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 18:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

I'm okay to withdraw. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 08:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect sliding sport, delete others. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 14:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Sliding sport → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sliding-sport → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sliding-sports → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Slidingsport → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sliding sports → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Slidingsports → Winter sport  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The term "sliding" is not mentioned in the target article. In addition, per research, it seems that the phrase "sliding sport" refers exclusively to either Skeleton (sport) or Bobsleigh; the current target of these redirects, Winter sport, refers to more sports than those two. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• The three Olympic "sliding sports" of Skeleton, Bobsleigh and Luge are forms of sledding, so retarget Sliding sport and Sliding sports there. Delete the ones with hyphens and no spaces, these forms are never used. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply
• Retarget Sliding sport and Sliding sports to sledding and delete others per Tavix's recommendations. It looks like the three Olympic sports have been mentioned in the opening paragraph of the article since 2010, maybe earlier but there were a lot of back-and-forth edits back then. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:47, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 19:19, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

• Capital project Devision & Gandhinagar Road & Building Department → Gandhinagar  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

There is no content about the Capital project Division (or Devision) in article Gandhinagar. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:56, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete non-notable organization without mention in the target article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 08:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.