The nominated redirect was Deleted. --
JLaTondre 12:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Not a good redirect IMO, as Chancery Lane is quite famous in legal circles as the home of many lawyers. A lot of the incoming links are totally unrelated to the tube station.
Tim! 17:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nomination. I've heard of Chancery Lane, but never of Chancery Lane tube station. I imagine that's a pretty common situation. --
Rbraunwa 00:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The nominated redirect was Deleted. --
JLaTondre 22:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Seemingly repetitive and unneeded. Does anybody really search for this? Google'ing didn't get me far, as it parsed the '+' out anyway.
Thadius856 04:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete Unnecessary redirect.--Húsönd 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as implausible search term. I find it highly unlikely that anyone would search for "
Open+content".
Picaroon9288 23:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. I've reconsidered. Some people cut and paste from the address bar. This could be helpful in such a case. Not that I'm advocating the systematic creation of these redirects, but at least this isn't ambiguous. —
TKD::
Talk 07:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Delete. Implausible typo. —
TKD::
Talk 06:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. Keeping it to deal with cut & paste from address bar may encourage people to do the same for other articles.
Pavel Vozenilek 14:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The nominated redirect was Deleted. --
JLaTondre 12:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Not a good redirect IMO, as Chancery Lane is quite famous in legal circles as the home of many lawyers. A lot of the incoming links are totally unrelated to the tube station.
Tim! 17:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nomination. I've heard of Chancery Lane, but never of Chancery Lane tube station. I imagine that's a pretty common situation. --
Rbraunwa 00:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)reply
The nominated redirect was Deleted. --
JLaTondre 22:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Seemingly repetitive and unneeded. Does anybody really search for this? Google'ing didn't get me far, as it parsed the '+' out anyway.
Thadius856 04:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete Unnecessary redirect.--Húsönd 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete as implausible search term. I find it highly unlikely that anyone would search for "
Open+content".
Picaroon9288 23:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. I've reconsidered. Some people cut and paste from the address bar. This could be helpful in such a case. Not that I'm advocating the systematic creation of these redirects, but at least this isn't ambiguous. —
TKD::
Talk 07:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Delete. Implausible typo. —
TKD::
Talk 06:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. Keeping it to deal with cut & paste from address bar may encourage people to do the same for other articles.
Pavel Vozenilek 14:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)reply