 | This is an
essay on
notability. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Editors that contribute to review of WP:AFC submissions and patrol new pages observe some recurring items in articles which turn out to be copyright violations. These all boil down to a level of writing or photography which is "too good to be true", especially from a new editor. A writing style that most editors are unlikely to use themselves but a professional writer especially one tasked with promoting a business or other entity is likely to use. These red flags can be indicators that further investigation is warranted to ensure there is no copyright violation.
- All capitals in the article title or sections. Web pages use this to grab attention. Small caps typesetting looks one way on web page but when copied and pasted to a text format like Wikipedia, appears all caps. Seeing this in a Wikipedia article can be an indication that it was copied and pasted from a webpage.
- Promotional sounding language this is a problem in itself but can also be an indicator that the material was copied from elsewhere.
- Polished writing from new editors or long articles lacking wiki formatting New editors don't create articles that are as well written or formatted as experienced ones. When a well written and formatted article shows up from a new editor, a check to ensure it wasn't copied from somewhere is warranted.
- Radical style changes: if the writing style suddenly changes to a very academic style (or to a chatty conversational tone), this could indicate a place where some text is cut-and-pasted from a website
- 1st person tense ("I launched Foo Enterprises to...") This can also indicate WP:COI
- Sounds like a press release probably because it was copied from a press release ("The Foo-Matic slices. It dices. But that's not all!")
- Big claims and no references: "The Foo-Meisters were the number one punk-foo band in the UK for all of the 1990s." A variant is big claims and a non-independent or fan website source
- Long articles lacking Wiki formatting
- professional-looking images examples include portraits that appear to have been taken in a studio setting; photographers or other rights-holders generally retain copyright of those images.
- reference formatting without the actual references. The most common example is parenthetical numbers which would refer to a reference list, except there is no reference list. This normally indicates a copy from a term paper or academic article where that is this preferred style.
- A Google search on a particularly well written (or otherwise unusual) sentence can locate the original source. Put the sentence or sentence fragments in "quotes like this". You have the best likelihood of finding the sentence if multiple unusual words are used. The sentence fragment "This is the case..." will produce millions of hits. "Aardvarks in paradigmatic frameworks..." will probably be easier to find. :)
- for images, visit Google image search and drag the image onto the search box to search Google on that image.
| This is an
essay on
notability. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Editors that contribute to review of WP:AFC submissions and patrol new pages observe some recurring items in articles which turn out to be copyright violations. These all boil down to a level of writing or photography which is "too good to be true", especially from a new editor. A writing style that most editors are unlikely to use themselves but a professional writer especially one tasked with promoting a business or other entity is likely to use. These red flags can be indicators that further investigation is warranted to ensure there is no copyright violation.
- All capitals in the article title or sections. Web pages use this to grab attention. Small caps typesetting looks one way on web page but when copied and pasted to a text format like Wikipedia, appears all caps. Seeing this in a Wikipedia article can be an indication that it was copied and pasted from a webpage.
- Promotional sounding language this is a problem in itself but can also be an indicator that the material was copied from elsewhere.
- Polished writing from new editors or long articles lacking wiki formatting New editors don't create articles that are as well written or formatted as experienced ones. When a well written and formatted article shows up from a new editor, a check to ensure it wasn't copied from somewhere is warranted.
- Radical style changes: if the writing style suddenly changes to a very academic style (or to a chatty conversational tone), this could indicate a place where some text is cut-and-pasted from a website
- 1st person tense ("I launched Foo Enterprises to...") This can also indicate WP:COI
- Sounds like a press release probably because it was copied from a press release ("The Foo-Matic slices. It dices. But that's not all!")
- Big claims and no references: "The Foo-Meisters were the number one punk-foo band in the UK for all of the 1990s." A variant is big claims and a non-independent or fan website source
- Long articles lacking Wiki formatting
- professional-looking images examples include portraits that appear to have been taken in a studio setting; photographers or other rights-holders generally retain copyright of those images.
- reference formatting without the actual references. The most common example is parenthetical numbers which would refer to a reference list, except there is no reference list. This normally indicates a copy from a term paper or academic article where that is this preferred style.
- A Google search on a particularly well written (or otherwise unusual) sentence can locate the original source. Put the sentence or sentence fragments in "quotes like this". You have the best likelihood of finding the sentence if multiple unusual words are used. The sentence fragment "This is the case..." will produce millions of hits. "Aardvarks in paradigmatic frameworks..." will probably be easier to find. :)
- for images, visit Google image search and drag the image onto the search box to search Google on that image.