October 9
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Ct scan.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- I really do not think this is a free file, given that the same uploader has recently not provided rationale, licensing, or a source for other recent image uploads. Also, and I worry about a possible privacy breach for whoever this image represents (not saying it here since I do not want this edit to get
WP:OVERSIGHT-ed.)
Steel1943 (
talk) 03:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. If evidence is provided that
Jack1956 (
talk ·
contribs) is the copyright owner, I will personally reinstate the image. Cheers,
TLSuda (
talk) 16:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Thomas Turgoose 2015.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Something about this image doesn't seem right to me. For one, this image seems like it was cropped from another image, so it is difficult to see what original picture this image came from. And for two, without the original image, it is difficult to validate that the uploader can release any part of the primary image with a free license.
Steel1943 (
talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The image is cropped from a photo I took of my friend with Turgoose on my phone. I have cut my friend out of the image as not being relevant to the article. That's his arm around Turgoose's shoulder.
Jack1956 (
talk) 10:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. The uncropped version of this image was previously published on Instagram
here. Jack1956 will need to prove he's the photographer because that is currently unverifiable. —
ξ
xplicit 19:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- How do I prove that? Take a photo of me taking the photo?
Jack1956 (
talk) 23:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
User:Jack1956: Either prove that it is your Instagram account (if you uploaded it there), or that you uploaded it somewhere else before it was posted to Instagram. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 23:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
- It is not my Instagram account nor did I upload it elsewhere. I was there, I took the photo on my phone and texted it to my friend who asked me to take the photo.
Jack1956 (
talk) 18:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Then your friend would have to demonstrate that he has access to the Instagram account or an earlier source and confirm that you are the photographer. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 18:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
- @
Jack1956: If you could ask your friend to edit the caption to include something along the lines "Photo taken by Jack1956", that should do it. —
ξ
xplicit 06:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:RepGrijalvaOfficialPortrait.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- This is most likely not a free file, but whether or not the image is eligible for copyright is not clear. The only place I was able to find any version of this photo online was at the subject's Twitter account. Either way, it is rather unclear who took the original photo as it was not the uploader.
Steel1943 (
talk) 07:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Concern has been addressed. —
ξ
xplicit 19:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:CO-ScheduleClasses.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Linked license terms appear to be "Wikipedia only".
Kelly
hi! 08:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Tetamashimba.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- No evidence this is in the public domain in Zambia. In that country, government works are not in the public domain until 50 years after publication. See
Commons:Template:PD-Zambia.
Kelly
hi! 09:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:ALPHAROG.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Unclear if the uploader is the copyright holder. Seems to refer to a user on Commons, but the only similar image I can find there is
File:Reaction factor.jpg, which is actually lower-resolution than this and refers back to this file as a source.
Kelly
hi! 11:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Carlos and Jason Sanchez in studio, 2009.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Claimed as own work but also cites "Jolianne L'Allier Matteau". No evidence the uploader is this person.
Kelly
hi! 12:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- OTRS permission needed.
Yann (
talk) 00:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. —
ξ
xplicit 19:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Miss Possibilities Logo.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- This may exceed threshold of originality in respect of the crown..
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 13:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Converted to fair use. —
ξ
xplicit 19:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Underdog(Brutto).jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- This is an album cover, Permission claimed, but no evidence that i can see.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 16:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{
dfu}} or list it at
WP:Non-free content review.
AnomieBOT
⚡ 18:12, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Converted to fair use. —
ξ
xplicit 19:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Thorp academy logo 201501.png (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
It's a simple, geometric design and not trademarked, you officious buffons
Savvo (
talk) 13:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Kenneth Earl Medrano, That's My Bae Grand Winner on Eat Bulaga 2015.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Self-work claim not credible. Deleted thrice at
the Commons for being a copyright violation taken directly from the subject's official Facebook page.
Nick—
Contact/
Contribs 17:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Commons image was in fact different (see URL in the deletion log) but this one is clearly a selfie and unless the uploader is Medrano himself this is a copyvio.
BethNaught (
talk) 20:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy delete as a prima face copyvio. Nowhere does the uploader state he is Medrano. If he does so then the problem goes away, at least in this form. 11:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC) My apologies. I added this comment and typed an incorrect number of tildes. Signed now, albeit late
Fiddle
Faddle 20:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Obvious copyvio.
Yann (
talk) 00:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Converted to fair use. —
ξ
xplicit 19:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:THC logo horiz PMS color.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Aubrey Boomer-1927.JPG (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- The file name lists this as being from 1927 whereas the description says 'circa 1921'. No source, so we can't know which year it is from.
Stefan2 (
talk) 19:29, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Fashion Model Nov 2012.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Appears to be an ad, video capture or title card.
Eeekster (
talk) 23:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete unless OTRS permission comes soon.
Yann (
talk) 00:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:AKP Parti-logo.svg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Exceeds threshold of originality, too complex to be PD-logo
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 23:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete
Yann (
talk) 00:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 20:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Art meadow1.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
logs).
- Refered as from the angle and nature of these photos these look like architectural models as opposed to the actual buildings.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 23:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.