From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Olfactory reference syndrome

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Rationale for peer review request:

  1. this is a psychiatric disorder and I am not a psychiatrist,
  2. neither do I have any real experience editing articles that are about psychiatric disorders,
  3. Previously a short "start" class article, I have promoted to B class now
  4. perhaps I would like to take this article to GAN next.

N.B.

  • there were very limited secondary and tertiary sources available which met WP:MEDRS, most info is in the form of case reports & I have tried to avoid these wherever possible. We have 4 reviews (2 calling themselves systematic) and 1 book chapter that are used extensively to form the basis of the article.
  • I believe there are one or 2 primary sources to support some very obvious content that I felt was required, but could not find any secondary source for.
  • Given the paucity of sources, I took the liberty of extending MEDDATE to about 10 years (or more in a few cases) instead of last 5 years.
  • Have used the MEDMOS layout for diseases, disorders and syndromes. Not sure if this is the norm for psych articles, and not sure it is entirely appropriate for this condition.

Kind regards, Lesion ( talk) 18:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC) reply

  • I'm closing this peer review because I want to nominate for good article. Although a few editors from WPPSYCH read over the article, they did not in the end use this page, so no matter. Lesion ( talk) 10:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Olfactory reference syndrome

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Rationale for peer review request:

  1. this is a psychiatric disorder and I am not a psychiatrist,
  2. neither do I have any real experience editing articles that are about psychiatric disorders,
  3. Previously a short "start" class article, I have promoted to B class now
  4. perhaps I would like to take this article to GAN next.

N.B.

  • there were very limited secondary and tertiary sources available which met WP:MEDRS, most info is in the form of case reports & I have tried to avoid these wherever possible. We have 4 reviews (2 calling themselves systematic) and 1 book chapter that are used extensively to form the basis of the article.
  • I believe there are one or 2 primary sources to support some very obvious content that I felt was required, but could not find any secondary source for.
  • Given the paucity of sources, I took the liberty of extending MEDDATE to about 10 years (or more in a few cases) instead of last 5 years.
  • Have used the MEDMOS layout for diseases, disorders and syndromes. Not sure if this is the norm for psych articles, and not sure it is entirely appropriate for this condition.

Kind regards, Lesion ( talk) 18:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC) reply

  • I'm closing this peer review because I want to nominate for good article. Although a few editors from WPPSYCH read over the article, they did not in the end use this page, so no matter. Lesion ( talk) 10:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook