I really like this guy as a historical character, and would like to give him his due here at Wikipedia. I've been working on this article a lot recently and just thought it would be a good time to get some other eyes on it and see if this could become a FA. — Laura Scudder ☎ 00:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
I just stumbled across {{ Biography}}. Do you think that I should do most of the discussion of his writings in a seperate section as they do? — Laura Scudder ☎ 15:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm in the process of merging in material from a duplicate article at Adriaen Van der Donck that was just pointed out, so the article probably warrants another look. The Early life and leads sections have gotten longer, and the period in Rensselaerwyck has been fleshed out.
Also, question for anyone out there: the article I'm merging from lists quite a lot of references, but nothing is specifically cited. I think I'm just going to move the new non-primary sources to a Further reading section until I take a look at them, but what about the primary sources — should I just go ahead and list his most famous writings? — Laura Scudder ☎ 21:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I really like this guy as a historical character, and would like to give him his due here at Wikipedia. I've been working on this article a lot recently and just thought it would be a good time to get some other eyes on it and see if this could become a FA. — Laura Scudder ☎ 00:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
I just stumbled across {{ Biography}}. Do you think that I should do most of the discussion of his writings in a seperate section as they do? — Laura Scudder ☎ 15:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm in the process of merging in material from a duplicate article at Adriaen Van der Donck that was just pointed out, so the article probably warrants another look. The Early life and leads sections have gotten longer, and the period in Rensselaerwyck has been fleshed out.
Also, question for anyone out there: the article I'm merging from lists quite a lot of references, but nothing is specifically cited. I think I'm just going to move the new non-primary sources to a Further reading section until I take a look at them, but what about the primary sources — should I just go ahead and list his most famous writings? — Laura Scudder ☎ 21:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)