- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. I'm not going to tag it inactive or historical because even a single user can improve the interwiki coverage without formal collaboration. Non-admin closure. Shalom Hello 01:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Echo
Last edit in April 2007 SLSB talk • contrib 18:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Tag as inactive - This project tends to search for articles on other wikipedia projects which are featured. Miranda 00:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I am wondering if someone can make a bot to look for FA articles on other FL Wikipedias and update them on en and other Wikipedia related projects. 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- You might post at Wikipedia talk:Pages needing translation into English or at Wikipedia:Bot requests. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I am wondering if someone can make a bot to look for FA articles on other FL Wikipedias and update them on en and other Wikipedia related projects. 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, and tag as historical. There is absolutely no need to delete any WikiProject of any sort. – sebi 07:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, we never delete inactive wikiprojects, only (on occasion) wikiprojects that never got off the ground in the first place. >Radiant< 08:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Radiant. Mel sa ran 18:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Inactive project pages are still potentially useful in the future to editors (in fact, many are listed in the index I've been working on). Moreover, deleting the article actually requires more space on the servers than if the article is left as is (a deletion is essentially just one more version to be recorded). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - as per the above. John Carter 14:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep- is simply inactive, per Radiant. Neranei talk 16:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep. I'm not going to tag it inactive or historical because even a single user can improve the interwiki coverage without formal collaboration. Non-admin closure. Shalom Hello 01:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Echo
Last edit in April 2007 SLSB talk • contrib 18:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Tag as inactive - This project tends to search for articles on other wikipedia projects which are featured. Miranda 00:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I am wondering if someone can make a bot to look for FA articles on other FL Wikipedias and update them on en and other Wikipedia related projects. 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- You might post at Wikipedia talk:Pages needing translation into English or at Wikipedia:Bot requests. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I am wondering if someone can make a bot to look for FA articles on other FL Wikipedias and update them on en and other Wikipedia related projects. 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, and tag as historical. There is absolutely no need to delete any WikiProject of any sort. – sebi 07:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, we never delete inactive wikiprojects, only (on occasion) wikiprojects that never got off the ground in the first place. >Radiant< 08:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Radiant. Mel sa ran 18:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Inactive project pages are still potentially useful in the future to editors (in fact, many are listed in the index I've been working on). Moreover, deleting the article actually requires more space on the servers than if the article is left as is (a deletion is essentially just one more version to be recorded). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - as per the above. John Carter 14:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep- is simply inactive, per Radiant. Neranei talk 16:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.