The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:UPNOT, this userbox is irrelevant and continues the perception of Wikipedia as a boy's club. QuietCicadachirp 14:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I was going to quick agree per nom, but
National Cleavage Day is real, and happens every year. So I think it is merely corny.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 12:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Mild keep (although moving it out of UBX might be an option)
While I can see nom’s rationale, that is not what the actual holiday is about.
I’ll refrain from mansplaining about “big boob problems” and just note that although it’s a “commercially insprired” holiday à la Hallmark, it’s a movement to promote
body positivity in the
Global South.
Also, over a dozen users are transcluding it, none of whom have been notified (I assume).
Delete -
WP:UPNOT prohibits from user space content which is "likely to bring the project into disrepute or which is likely to give widespread offense". This qualifies.
Hatman31 (
talk) 17:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)reply
*Delete That trash has no place on Wikipedia. We already have a shortage of woman editors.
Scorpions1325 (
talk) 02:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep for several reasons, and in consistence with my vote
here. First of all,
Wikipedia is not censored. Then, as noted above,
National Cleavage Day is real, not something invented by the creator of this userbox. Also, I see this nomination as an attempt at preaching on morality (at least in part), and I am categorically against that in any form. In the end, this userbox is rather similar to some that I have on my userpage, like
this and
this. IMHO, it is possible (and desirable) to admire female beauty without insulting women and disregarding their rights, and I see this userbox as staying within that line. —
Sundostundmppria(
talk /
contribs) 13:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - what's wrong with supporting
National Cleavage Day? Can anyone tell me where it says that a women can't support this? There are in fact women who are attracted to other women. I don't see how
WP:UPNOT applies in this case due to the "broad agreement" mention. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk) 14:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Changed to Keep I was not aware that
National Cleavage Day was a holiday. If it means something other than a bad-faith attempt at mocking women I see no problem with it.
Scorpions1325 (
talk) 02:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I propose changing the wording to "This user supports women who celebrate
National Cleavage Day." This sounds much better.
Scorpions1325 (
talk) 02:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:UPNOT, this userbox is irrelevant and continues the perception of Wikipedia as a boy's club. QuietCicadachirp 14:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I was going to quick agree per nom, but
National Cleavage Day is real, and happens every year. So I think it is merely corny.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 12:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Mild keep (although moving it out of UBX might be an option)
While I can see nom’s rationale, that is not what the actual holiday is about.
I’ll refrain from mansplaining about “big boob problems” and just note that although it’s a “commercially insprired” holiday à la Hallmark, it’s a movement to promote
body positivity in the
Global South.
Also, over a dozen users are transcluding it, none of whom have been notified (I assume).
Delete -
WP:UPNOT prohibits from user space content which is "likely to bring the project into disrepute or which is likely to give widespread offense". This qualifies.
Hatman31 (
talk) 17:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)reply
*Delete That trash has no place on Wikipedia. We already have a shortage of woman editors.
Scorpions1325 (
talk) 02:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep for several reasons, and in consistence with my vote
here. First of all,
Wikipedia is not censored. Then, as noted above,
National Cleavage Day is real, not something invented by the creator of this userbox. Also, I see this nomination as an attempt at preaching on morality (at least in part), and I am categorically against that in any form. In the end, this userbox is rather similar to some that I have on my userpage, like
this and
this. IMHO, it is possible (and desirable) to admire female beauty without insulting women and disregarding their rights, and I see this userbox as staying within that line. —
Sundostundmppria(
talk /
contribs) 13:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep - what's wrong with supporting
National Cleavage Day? Can anyone tell me where it says that a women can't support this? There are in fact women who are attracted to other women. I don't see how
WP:UPNOT applies in this case due to the "broad agreement" mention. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk) 14:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Changed to Keep I was not aware that
National Cleavage Day was a holiday. If it means something other than a bad-faith attempt at mocking women I see no problem with it.
Scorpions1325 (
talk) 02:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I propose changing the wording to "This user supports women who celebrate
National Cleavage Day." This sounds much better.
Scorpions1325 (
talk) 02:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.