- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep as withdrawn, and noted on this mfd Syn ergy 17:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
User:Tezkag72/Userboxes/Homophobe
Nomination withdrawn
Blatantly offensive and aggravating userbox. Not acceptable on Wikipedia. Josh Atkins ( talk - contribs) 15:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. If anyone's "blatantly offended" by this – which is, after all, what many of the world's leading religions believe – they really ought to get out more. As per all the others, this isn't in the Wikipedia space and per the "German solution" consensus reached after the Userbox Wars (and also per my reading of Jimbo's comments on the matter). – iride scent 17:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Should we also delete the articles on homosexuality, homophobia, gay marriage and gay rights? Those are, to some people, "blatantly offensive and aggravating". -- LightSpectra ( talk) 17:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good point. -- Josh Atkins ( talk - contribs) 17:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep as withdrawn, and noted on this mfd Syn ergy 17:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
User:Tezkag72/Userboxes/Homophobe
Nomination withdrawn
Blatantly offensive and aggravating userbox. Not acceptable on Wikipedia. Josh Atkins ( talk - contribs) 15:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. If anyone's "blatantly offended" by this – which is, after all, what many of the world's leading religions believe – they really ought to get out more. As per all the others, this isn't in the Wikipedia space and per the "German solution" consensus reached after the Userbox Wars (and also per my reading of Jimbo's comments on the matter). – iride scent 17:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Should we also delete the articles on homosexuality, homophobia, gay marriage and gay rights? Those are, to some people, "blatantly offensive and aggravating". -- LightSpectra ( talk) 17:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good point. -- Josh Atkins ( talk - contribs) 17:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.