The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep.
JohnCD (
talk) 15:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Previously speedily deleted per
WP:CSD#U5, but it has exactly the same problem, consisting mostly of a series of YouTube links of no use here. Whether intended for personal use or sharing with others it is an inappropriate use of a user page.
JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
note I did not notice before nominating (I did check the history and logs but missed it) but it has been previously nominated, see
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aaabbb11. But that was on different grounds to this nomination so is unlikely to be a re-run of that discussion.--
JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep No really solid grounds for deletion of what appears to be "
mostly harmless"
Collect (
talk) 20:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. That was a bad U5. Keep, because much of the content of the page involved valid user opinion related to the project. Other parts of the content relate to the user's interest in contributing to the project. Maybe some parts go too far, maybe the youtube links are too much, but deletion is far to clumsy a solution to a poorly stated problem. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 14:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was keep.
JohnCD (
talk) 15:11, 2 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Previously speedily deleted per
WP:CSD#U5, but it has exactly the same problem, consisting mostly of a series of YouTube links of no use here. Whether intended for personal use or sharing with others it is an inappropriate use of a user page.
JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
note I did not notice before nominating (I did check the history and logs but missed it) but it has been previously nominated, see
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aaabbb11. But that was on different grounds to this nomination so is unlikely to be a re-run of that discussion.--
JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 18:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep No really solid grounds for deletion of what appears to be "
mostly harmless"
Collect (
talk) 20:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. That was a bad U5. Keep, because much of the content of the page involved valid user opinion related to the project. Other parts of the content relate to the user's interest in contributing to the project. Maybe some parts go too far, maybe the youtube links are too much, but deletion is far to clumsy a solution to a poorly stated problem. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 14:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.