- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete . nonsense DGG ( talk ) 00:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Mental Potentials Create Many Realities or Many Worlds
- Draft:Mental Potentials Create Many Realities or Many Worlds ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Appears to be the recreation of a previously deleted article ( discussion) about a non-notable quantum mysticism ( WP:FRINGE topic) book. Since I cannot assess if the previous article was mostly the same and that some time elapsed before its recreation, I'm unsure if CSD G4 would apply, so nominating it here. — Paleo Neonate – 10:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Deletey McDeleteface - I can't even be bothered to explain why since it's so obviously patent nonsense. Famous dog (c) 11:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable nonsense. I checked the original article, and they're not so much the same that WP:G4 applies. Bishonen | talk 11:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC).
- The question isn’t whether it is nonsense... but whether it is Notable nonsense. Since the draft does not even tell us who the book’s author is, much less how it has been received... I lean towards saying delete. But I could change my mind if it can be established that there are reviews and other sources that have discussed it. Blueboar ( talk) 12:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete It's a WP:SELFPUB tract published by the author on Createspace. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 15:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete only mentions of the work are "everything published recently on-line" stuff except for one dubious "foundation" link, plus reams of false positives. Nobody appears to care enough to address its arguments. Mangoe ( talk) 16:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per above and my nomination of the original article. Promotion for a self-published book that's full of bollocks. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 01:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per previous AfD. VQuakr ( talk) 05:06, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per all above. What is this going on about? My name isnotdave ( talk/ contribs) 16:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete . nonsense DGG ( talk ) 00:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Mental Potentials Create Many Realities or Many Worlds
- Draft:Mental Potentials Create Many Realities or Many Worlds ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Appears to be the recreation of a previously deleted article ( discussion) about a non-notable quantum mysticism ( WP:FRINGE topic) book. Since I cannot assess if the previous article was mostly the same and that some time elapsed before its recreation, I'm unsure if CSD G4 would apply, so nominating it here. — Paleo Neonate – 10:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Deletey McDeleteface - I can't even be bothered to explain why since it's so obviously patent nonsense. Famous dog (c) 11:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable nonsense. I checked the original article, and they're not so much the same that WP:G4 applies. Bishonen | talk 11:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC).
- The question isn’t whether it is nonsense... but whether it is Notable nonsense. Since the draft does not even tell us who the book’s author is, much less how it has been received... I lean towards saying delete. But I could change my mind if it can be established that there are reviews and other sources that have discussed it. Blueboar ( talk) 12:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete It's a WP:SELFPUB tract published by the author on Createspace. - LuckyLouie ( talk) 15:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete only mentions of the work are "everything published recently on-line" stuff except for one dubious "foundation" link, plus reams of false positives. Nobody appears to care enough to address its arguments. Mangoe ( talk) 16:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per above and my nomination of the original article. Promotion for a self-published book that's full of bollocks. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 01:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per previous AfD. VQuakr ( talk) 05:06, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per all above. What is this going on about? My name isnotdave ( talk/ contribs) 16:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.