- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . as overly promotional — Spaceman Spiff 09:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Draft:KT Astrologer
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}}; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}}. |
Promotional autobiography for an astrologer. I don't see how any amount of editing could make it appropriate for Wikipedia. It's not a question of tone or phrasing, but of the subject and the claims made for their skills and abilities. No reliable sources have been offered for these skills and abilities (nor can any be, in my world). Bishonen | talk 19:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Some very iffy sourcing (it seems some of it is actually to other Wikipedia articles), no evidence of real notability. Slatersteven ( talk) 19:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
It seems the youtube video "'youtube link'". is posted on Sep 27, 2017. So his predictions are in good standing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Reference to other Wikipedia articles is used to explain that CA wildfires October_2017_Northern_California_wildfires has happened in Oct 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- — Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Bishonen | talk 22:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC).
- @ Davecarlos: please read WP:NOTSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 20:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Six of the nine references are WP:SELFPUBLISHED. The Grahasanket Magazine sources do not look reliable, and in any case fail verification. The News24 reference doesn't mention Kathir Subbiah. This draft is about a non-notable astrologer and serves only to promote him. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 20:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It is the magazine being published in Maharashtra in their local language. Someone from India can verify this. New24 mentions KT Astrologer, which is Kathir Subbiah. You can refer to his website "ktastro web". and amazon author page "amazon page".. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) 20:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Davecarlos ( talk) 21:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Grahasanket Magazine is a printed magazine in Maharashtra. It does not have online version. Scanning the magazine and uploading it as image file can help here! Sathya43 ( talk) 21:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- — Sathya43 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep: He self-published "'youtube link'". on Sep 27, 2017. His predictions came true exactly on Oct 09, 2017. We need to keep this page, monitor any further developments closely. Deleting the page only because of "self-publish" is not fair process - i believe! my 2 cents. Indira1951 ( talk) 21:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- — Indira1951 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Socking. This is getting quite ridiculous. The SPAs Davecarlos, Sathya43, and Indira1951 are obviously one person. For one thing, they're all brand new, and for another, they all sign in the same erroneous way (both before and after their comment), see History. I've blocked them all for abusing multiple accounts. I guess they weren't able to predict that. Bishonen | talk 22:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC).
- Delete Utterly non-notable and not supported by any WP:RS. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable, sources are at best primary and self-published, and at worst don't support claims they are there to cite. Godo grief - a press release was used? This is a promotional article and should be deleted. Ravensfire ( talk) 23:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Purely promotional A search finds no reliable sources establishing notability, article makes extraordinary pseudoscientific claims that require extraordinary proof. And the smell of socks posting keep !votes is making this place smell like a locker room. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 23:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Cannot find sources in large English papers. Promotional article with primary-sourced extraordinary claims. — Paleo Neonate – 04:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete . as overly promotional — Spaceman Spiff 09:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Draft:KT Astrologer
|
| If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}}; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}}. |
Promotional autobiography for an astrologer. I don't see how any amount of editing could make it appropriate for Wikipedia. It's not a question of tone or phrasing, but of the subject and the claims made for their skills and abilities. No reliable sources have been offered for these skills and abilities (nor can any be, in my world). Bishonen | talk 19:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Some very iffy sourcing (it seems some of it is actually to other Wikipedia articles), no evidence of real notability. Slatersteven ( talk) 19:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
It seems the youtube video "'youtube link'". is posted on Sep 27, 2017. So his predictions are in good standing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Reference to other Wikipedia articles is used to explain that CA wildfires October_2017_Northern_California_wildfires has happened in Oct 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- — Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Bishonen | talk 22:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC).
- @ Davecarlos: please read WP:NOTSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 20:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Six of the nine references are WP:SELFPUBLISHED. The Grahasanket Magazine sources do not look reliable, and in any case fail verification. The News24 reference doesn't mention Kathir Subbiah. This draft is about a non-notable astrologer and serves only to promote him. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 20:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It is the magazine being published in Maharashtra in their local language. Someone from India can verify this. New24 mentions KT Astrologer, which is Kathir Subbiah. You can refer to his website "ktastro web". and amazon author page "amazon page".. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davecarlos ( talk • contribs) 20:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Davecarlos ( talk) 21:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Grahasanket Magazine is a printed magazine in Maharashtra. It does not have online version. Scanning the magazine and uploading it as image file can help here! Sathya43 ( talk) 21:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- — Sathya43 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep: He self-published "'youtube link'". on Sep 27, 2017. His predictions came true exactly on Oct 09, 2017. We need to keep this page, monitor any further developments closely. Deleting the page only because of "self-publish" is not fair process - i believe! my 2 cents. Indira1951 ( talk) 21:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- — Indira1951 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Socking. This is getting quite ridiculous. The SPAs Davecarlos, Sathya43, and Indira1951 are obviously one person. For one thing, they're all brand new, and for another, they all sign in the same erroneous way (both before and after their comment), see History. I've blocked them all for abusing multiple accounts. I guess they weren't able to predict that. Bishonen | talk 22:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC).
- Delete Utterly non-notable and not supported by any WP:RS. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable, sources are at best primary and self-published, and at worst don't support claims they are there to cite. Godo grief - a press release was used? This is a promotional article and should be deleted. Ravensfire ( talk) 23:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Purely promotional A search finds no reliable sources establishing notability, article makes extraordinary pseudoscientific claims that require extraordinary proof. And the smell of socks posting keep !votes is making this place smell like a locker room. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 23:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Cannot find sources in large English papers. Promotional article with primary-sourced extraordinary claims. — Paleo Neonate – 04:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.