From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Devanga Dharma

Draft:Devanga Dharma ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Article already exists in verbatim at Devanga, minus a few words author wants removed (see all five copies of edit requests made 13 April 2024 on Talk: Devanga). Requests were declined due to lack of a WP:RS. Zinnober9 ( talk) 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

please remove some content like shudra from devanga page please see reference in devanga dharma page Harishsk2022 ( talk) 05:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
remove this line it is not true we are not lower caste "They are of Shudra status in the Hindu caste system." Harishsk2022 ( talk) 05:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the draft as a recent copy of the old article. It should never have been made, and it’s existence is an ongoing attribution hazard, and it serves no purpose. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete as a copyright violaton. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • [EC] Delete this content fork. Oh yes, it's a copyright violation too. -- Hoary ( talk) 11:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete but do not speedily delete, because G12 doesn't apply since WP:RIA can be employed; of course, in spite of that, the page should be deleted.— Alalch E. 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - copy of existing article and blatant attempt to game the system and get around the page protection of the original. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as attribution violation and unnecessary copy. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete in the spirit of WP:COPIES. I have performed a WP:RIA edit summary as a precaution, but that does not mean we should keep this attribution hazard around. House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete as a content fork. Note Harishsk2022 was blocked for repeatedly making this edit request. —Matrix(!) { user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Devanga Dharma

Draft:Devanga Dharma ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Article already exists in verbatim at Devanga, minus a few words author wants removed (see all five copies of edit requests made 13 April 2024 on Talk: Devanga). Requests were declined due to lack of a WP:RS. Zinnober9 ( talk) 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

please remove some content like shudra from devanga page please see reference in devanga dharma page Harishsk2022 ( talk) 05:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
remove this line it is not true we are not lower caste "They are of Shudra status in the Hindu caste system." Harishsk2022 ( talk) 05:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the draft as a recent copy of the old article. It should never have been made, and it’s existence is an ongoing attribution hazard, and it serves no purpose. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 09:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete as a copyright violaton. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • [EC] Delete this content fork. Oh yes, it's a copyright violation too. -- Hoary ( talk) 11:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete but do not speedily delete, because G12 doesn't apply since WP:RIA can be employed; of course, in spite of that, the page should be deleted.— Alalch E. 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - copy of existing article and blatant attempt to game the system and get around the page protection of the original. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as attribution violation and unnecessary copy. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete in the spirit of WP:COPIES. I have performed a WP:RIA edit summary as a precaution, but that does not mean we should keep this attribution hazard around. House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete as a content fork. Note Harishsk2022 was blocked for repeatedly making this edit request. —Matrix(!) { user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook