The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
✗plicit 00:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Article already exists in verbatim at
Devanga, minus a few words author wants removed (see all five copies of edit requests made 13 April 2024 on
Talk: Devanga). Requests were declined due to lack of a
WP:RS.
Zinnober9 (
talk) 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
please remove some content like shudra from devanga page please see reference in devanga dharma page
Harishsk2022 (
talk) 05:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete the draft as a recent copy of the old article. It should never have been made, and it’s existence is an ongoing attribution hazard, and it serves no purpose.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 09:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
[EC] Delete this content fork. Oh yes, it's a copyright violation too. --
Hoary (
talk) 11:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete but do not speedily delete, because G12 doesn't apply since
WP:RIA can be employed; of course, in spite of that, the page should be deleted.—
Alalch E. 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete - copy of existing article and blatant attempt to game the system and get around the page protection of the original.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as attribution violation and unnecessary copy.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 03:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete in the spirit of
WP:COPIES. I have
performed a
WP:RIA edit summary as a precaution, but that does not mean we should keep this attribution hazard around. HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as a content fork. Note Harishsk2022 was blocked for repeatedly making this edit request. —Matrix(!) {user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions} 17:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
✗plicit 00:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Article already exists in verbatim at
Devanga, minus a few words author wants removed (see all five copies of edit requests made 13 April 2024 on
Talk: Devanga). Requests were declined due to lack of a
WP:RS.
Zinnober9 (
talk) 00:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
please remove some content like shudra from devanga page please see reference in devanga dharma page
Harishsk2022 (
talk) 05:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete the draft as a recent copy of the old article. It should never have been made, and it’s existence is an ongoing attribution hazard, and it serves no purpose.
SmokeyJoe (
talk) 09:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
[EC] Delete this content fork. Oh yes, it's a copyright violation too. --
Hoary (
talk) 11:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete but do not speedily delete, because G12 doesn't apply since
WP:RIA can be employed; of course, in spite of that, the page should be deleted.—
Alalch E. 12:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete - copy of existing article and blatant attempt to game the system and get around the page protection of the original.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as attribution violation and unnecessary copy.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 03:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete in the spirit of
WP:COPIES. I have
performed a
WP:RIA edit summary as a precaution, but that does not mean we should keep this attribution hazard around. HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as a content fork. Note Harishsk2022 was blocked for repeatedly making this edit request. —Matrix(!) {user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions} 17:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.