|
|
Sam Houston was a 19th century American statesman, politician and soldier. Sam Houston may also refer to:
|
For people, include their birth and death years (when known), and only enough descriptive information that the reader can distinguish between different people with the same name. Keep in mind the conventions for birth and death dates, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death.
John Smith is the name of:
|
In most cases, place the items in order of usage, with the most-used meanings appearing at the top and less common meanings below. A recommended order is:
Unless the list is quite short, separate the articles in categories (1) and (2) from those in (3) and (4), with the "may also be" line shown below:
Thingymabob may refer to:
Thingymabob may also be:
|
There may be a "See also" section which can include:
For every style suggestion above, there's some page which has a good reason to do something else. These guidelines are intended for consistency, but usefulness to the reader is the principal goal. So ignore these guidelines if you have a good reason.
Same as above.
The main section of a 2 name (Given name and Surname) dab should include all individuals who are best known by that given and Surname regardless of the existence/use of middle names, middle initials, maiden names, married names or middle name usage as given name. (I believe this is current usage of {{hndis}}).
There should also be a formatting preference for singleton interchanged substitutes titular given names. I.E., I propose that when one of the substitutes is a singleton without a dab (e.g., Robb Johnson) that it have a {{seealso}} hatnote such as
{{seealso|Bob Johnson|Rob Johnson|Bobby Johnson|Robert Johnson}} resulting in a hatnote reading
The above examples show some various cases for discussion purposes.
1. We have the question of order. If included does surname variation belong before middle name variation.
2. Do cases where the title last name is the middle name belong together or separate from cases where the title first name is the middle name if included. (Is there a maiden name policy).
3. If included should the surname dab read:
4. Is it still right to have these for shorter names. I have had some several persons object to adding such a section on shorter names until shown longer names.
5. Do we want to add a given name dab to the policy.
The biggest problem I see is with the shorter lists and lists of given names without extant alternate given name entries. For these names it is not apparent why this convention is ameliorative.
|
|
Sam Houston was a 19th century American statesman, politician and soldier. Sam Houston may also refer to:
|
For people, include their birth and death years (when known), and only enough descriptive information that the reader can distinguish between different people with the same name. Keep in mind the conventions for birth and death dates, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Dates of birth and death.
John Smith is the name of:
|
In most cases, place the items in order of usage, with the most-used meanings appearing at the top and less common meanings below. A recommended order is:
Unless the list is quite short, separate the articles in categories (1) and (2) from those in (3) and (4), with the "may also be" line shown below:
Thingymabob may refer to:
Thingymabob may also be:
|
There may be a "See also" section which can include:
For every style suggestion above, there's some page which has a good reason to do something else. These guidelines are intended for consistency, but usefulness to the reader is the principal goal. So ignore these guidelines if you have a good reason.
Same as above.
The main section of a 2 name (Given name and Surname) dab should include all individuals who are best known by that given and Surname regardless of the existence/use of middle names, middle initials, maiden names, married names or middle name usage as given name. (I believe this is current usage of {{hndis}}).
There should also be a formatting preference for singleton interchanged substitutes titular given names. I.E., I propose that when one of the substitutes is a singleton without a dab (e.g., Robb Johnson) that it have a {{seealso}} hatnote such as
{{seealso|Bob Johnson|Rob Johnson|Bobby Johnson|Robert Johnson}} resulting in a hatnote reading
The above examples show some various cases for discussion purposes.
1. We have the question of order. If included does surname variation belong before middle name variation.
2. Do cases where the title last name is the middle name belong together or separate from cases where the title first name is the middle name if included. (Is there a maiden name policy).
3. If included should the surname dab read:
4. Is it still right to have these for shorter names. I have had some several persons object to adding such a section on shorter names until shown longer names.
5. Do we want to add a given name dab to the policy.
The biggest problem I see is with the shorter lists and lists of given names without extant alternate given name entries. For these names it is not apparent why this convention is ameliorative.