Uploaded by Strawberryfire (
notify). Quoting from guidelines at
Wikipedia:Logos, "Generally, logos should be used only when the company and its logo are reasonably familiar (or when the logo itself is of interest for design or artistic reasons)." This corporate logo is not in any way reasonably familiar, or of interest for design or artistic reasons, and so is proposed for deletion. —
Kurieeto 13:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
If the image doesn't qualify, I have no problem with its deletion. However, the company website has a disclaimer saying all replications of company logos are OK as long as profit is not made from their design, and frankly I just think the page looks better with the logo than without it. -
Strawberryfire 00:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)reply
This picture is one of Apple's Mac OS X wallpapers (
10.3, Panther), therefore would be copyrighted under Apple. It isn't included on any articles and I don't see any valid reason for this picture to be included on Wikipedia.
Harryboyles 14:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:Dragontitles00001.jpg. Completely unnecessary image. Such information ought to be entered using wiki-tables. Furthermore, the info is incorrect, and no copyright status is given. —
Gulliver✉ 07:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Uploaded by Toronto98 (
notify). Uploader claims to be personal source for image; highly unlikely. CV probably.- — pd_THOR|=/\= | 08:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Apparently Toronto98 claims to be porn actress
Timea_Vagvoelgyi. I think that would be Toronto, Hungary. :P Obvious CV.
Kasreyn 18:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:Bradfieldplancolour.gif - I uploaded this to show another user that a diagram I had originally made was correct.It shouldn't be on WP. Please delete after 24/4/06. Thanks and Sorry. (
JROBBO 14:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC))reply
Uploaded by Strawberryfire (
notify). Quoting from guidelines at
Wikipedia:Logos, "Generally, logos should be used only when the company and its logo are reasonably familiar (or when the logo itself is of interest for design or artistic reasons)." This corporate logo is not in any way reasonably familiar, or of interest for design or artistic reasons, and so is proposed for deletion. —
Kurieeto 13:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
If the image doesn't qualify, I have no problem with its deletion. However, the company website has a disclaimer saying all replications of company logos are OK as long as profit is not made from their design, and frankly I just think the page looks better with the logo than without it. -
Strawberryfire 00:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)reply
This picture is one of Apple's Mac OS X wallpapers (
10.3, Panther), therefore would be copyrighted under Apple. It isn't included on any articles and I don't see any valid reason for this picture to be included on Wikipedia.
Harryboyles 14:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:Dragontitles00001.jpg. Completely unnecessary image. Such information ought to be entered using wiki-tables. Furthermore, the info is incorrect, and no copyright status is given. —
Gulliver✉ 07:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Uploaded by Toronto98 (
notify). Uploader claims to be personal source for image; highly unlikely. CV probably.- — pd_THOR|=/\= | 08:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Apparently Toronto98 claims to be porn actress
Timea_Vagvoelgyi. I think that would be Toronto, Hungary. :P Obvious CV.
Kasreyn 18:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Image:Bradfieldplancolour.gif - I uploaded this to show another user that a diagram I had originally made was correct.It shouldn't be on WP. Please delete after 24/4/06. Thanks and Sorry. (
JROBBO 14:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC))reply