This is a maintenance page for the Good Article project. It displays mismatches between articles labeled as Good Articles, articles that have undergone a Good Article review and articles listed at the Good Article home page. If an article appears here a mistake has likely been made or a step in the review process has been forgotten. Ideally the first four sub-headers should be empty.
Gambot automatically generates the page three times a week (Sunday, Wednesday, and Friday @ 6:30am), replacing the complete page. Thus for example manually deleting entries as they are fixed is acceptable since the new report will concur the pages are fixed. Other types of manual edits like adding entries, inline comments or changing the section headers would be overwritten.
Other sources of errors in the Good Articles process are:
Mismatches can occur for a variety of reasons and are usually easy to resolve.
These articles have the {{ Good article}} template on the article page (creates the green spot), but are not listed as having a successful review. It pays to check the history to see how this has occurred. Possible reasons include:
current status
field is empty in the {{
Article history}} template. It needs to say |currentstatus=GA
for the article to be placed in the Wikipedia good articles category.These articles are listed as having successfully passed a Good article review, but do not have the {{ Good article}} template on the article page. Possible reasons include:
current status
field still says "GA" in the {{Article history}} template after a delisting. It needs to say |currentstatus=DGA
for the article to be removed from the Wikipedia good articles category.Often this is simply a case of the reviewer forgetting to add the article when it is passed, or remove it when it is delisted. Check the status of the article and either add it to the appropriate list or remove it. Any article that has since become a Featured Article should also be removed.
This class of errors is not currently tracked by Gambot. To find articles that were erroneously tagged as GA-class, follow these steps:
class=GA
and class = GA
to just class=
.If you want to add an extra check, convert your sandbox list to articles, and then do another PetScan run to filter for pages that are missing {{ Good article}}.
Report generated 2024-05-03 at 05:37:46 by gambot. |
This is a maintenance page for the Good Article project. It displays mismatches between articles labeled as Good Articles, articles that have undergone a Good Article review and articles listed at the Good Article home page. If an article appears here a mistake has likely been made or a step in the review process has been forgotten. Ideally the first four sub-headers should be empty.
Gambot automatically generates the page three times a week (Sunday, Wednesday, and Friday @ 6:30am), replacing the complete page. Thus for example manually deleting entries as they are fixed is acceptable since the new report will concur the pages are fixed. Other types of manual edits like adding entries, inline comments or changing the section headers would be overwritten.
Other sources of errors in the Good Articles process are:
Mismatches can occur for a variety of reasons and are usually easy to resolve.
These articles have the {{ Good article}} template on the article page (creates the green spot), but are not listed as having a successful review. It pays to check the history to see how this has occurred. Possible reasons include:
current status
field is empty in the {{
Article history}} template. It needs to say |currentstatus=GA
for the article to be placed in the Wikipedia good articles category.These articles are listed as having successfully passed a Good article review, but do not have the {{ Good article}} template on the article page. Possible reasons include:
current status
field still says "GA" in the {{Article history}} template after a delisting. It needs to say |currentstatus=DGA
for the article to be removed from the Wikipedia good articles category.Often this is simply a case of the reviewer forgetting to add the article when it is passed, or remove it when it is delisted. Check the status of the article and either add it to the appropriate list or remove it. Any article that has since become a Featured Article should also be removed.
This class of errors is not currently tracked by Gambot. To find articles that were erroneously tagged as GA-class, follow these steps:
class=GA
and class = GA
to just class=
.If you want to add an extra check, convert your sandbox list to articles, and then do another PetScan run to filter for pages that are missing {{ Good article}}.
Report generated 2024-05-03 at 05:37:46 by gambot. |