The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
fails criteria 2.
only supported by four references (the fifth is used to support one sentence), which is already an issue.
the literary hub source appears to be based on the sixth tone source, and the engadget source appears to be based on the vice source. ltbdl ( talk) 14:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Verifiable with no original research. What part of the article is not verifiable? You appear to be making an argument about notability, which is something else. The place for that kind of discussion is WP:AFD. I would warn you that I do not believe this will fail an AfD. -- asilvering ( talk) 16:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
fails criteria 2.
only supported by four references (the fifth is used to support one sentence), which is already an issue.
the literary hub source appears to be based on the sixth tone source, and the engadget source appears to be based on the vice source. ltbdl ( talk) 14:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Verifiable with no original research. What part of the article is not verifiable? You appear to be making an argument about notability, which is something else. The place for that kind of discussion is WP:AFD. I would warn you that I do not believe this will fail an AfD. -- asilvering ( talk) 16:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)