The result of the discussion was: delete. Delete nominated image only. Other images mentioned in the discussion were not part of the nomination and not tagged for deletion in any way. Whpq ( talk) 03:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Image of a statue unveiled in 2020. Not an architectural work, so no FoP. Keeping this as a non-free image would probably be against WP:NFLISTS because there is little information in the article about the statue. I propose deletion. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 02:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Additionally, it should be noted that Mgreason also uploaded multiple images of plaques to the article, however I am assuming that these are ineligible for copyright as they consist of only text. -- Fhsig13 ( talk) 05:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 14:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
WP:BANDLOGO disallows non-free logos of music artists "unless the logo itself is discussed in the prose." This file can be replaced by a gallery of c:File:Nice Peter right DigiTour 2011 (cropped).jpg and c:File:Epic Lloyd3.jpg as on List of Epic Rap Battles of History episodes. JohnCWiesenthal ( talk) 04:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This isn't a free logo and not a suitable license provided. Furthermore, the given source is nowhere seen to have this Image. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 05:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof that this audio sample (i.e. portion of the recording) is contextually significant to either Crowded House (band) or Better Be Home Soon (song). George Ho ( talk) 06:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof that this audio sample (i.e. portion of the recording) is contextually significant to either Crowded House (band) or Don't Stop Now (song). George Ho ( talk) 06:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof that this audio sample (i.e. portion of the recording) is contextually significant to either Crowded House (band) or Distant Sun (song). George Ho ( talk) 06:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free. Whpq ( talk) 17:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright in this image has been restored by the URAA, as Pakistani (and British) copyright periods would still have been running in 1996. The only chance for this image to be considered in the public domain in the US is for it being a British (not Pakistani) Crown image that falls under the special clause that Crown copyright is considered to "expire worldwide" (cf. template:PD-UKGov). However, there is no indication that this is the case. If found to be copyrighted in the US, it could possibly still be used on the subject's article under non-free content provisions, but would presumably have to be removed from Chief of the Air Staff (Pakistan). Felix QW ( talk) 11:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Not "own work"; no author info; poorly drawn derivative work Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 14:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The event depicted here has always been dated "in the late 1930s", with the date "c. 1920s" added by ShakespeareFan00 in 2014. If it is from the late 1930s, that is, from 1936 or later, its copyright in the US would have been restored by the URAA and would not expire until 95 years after publication. The image is not in use on any pages. Felix QW ( talk) 13:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Due to the slight distortion of the Commons image, I don't think this qualifies for speedy deletion as a duplicate of this Commons version. However, the smaller resolution combined with the bad contrast means that at least for me, there is insufficient added value in retaining this local file. Felix QW ( talk) 15:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned file whose US copyright was renewed by the URAA in 1996. Felix QW ( talk) 15:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned file (disclaimer: It was used in List of hat styles to illustrate the cap, but I replaced in favour of File:Leonid Brezhnev 1974.jpg, where the hat can be seen much better). As a 1947 image from Pakistan, its copyright has been restored by the URAA and will not expire in the US until 2043. Felix QW ( talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The author of this map, taken from a pamphlet whose place of first publication is unclear to me (UK/India/Pakistan), died in 1951, and therefore should have entered the public domain in its source country some time between 2001 and 2021. Due to the URAA, US copyright will in all likelihood last until 2029. As this is a very valuable historic image, I am not sure whether non-free use might be possible; on the other hand, one could draw a free alternative showing the same proposed "states". Felix QW ( talk) 16:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Virtually identical to the original cover, just seems to be a 2D digital image rather than a photo of a box that has this swirl design on it. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 18:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
It is likely that this image is from after 1945 and that therefore it is copyrighted in the US due to URAA restoration. There are PD alternatives for identifying the subject on Commons, so non-free use will be difficult to justify. Felix QW ( talk) 18:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Pakistani image whose copyright has been restored by the URAA. Pakistani government works do not seem to have a rule such as, say, UK Crown works, that the URAA does not apply to them. Felix QW ( talk) 18:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photo, which was shot in Rome and is sourced to a website of the Australian Olympic Committee, was first published in Pakistan. If it were first published in Italy, then it could be a "simple photo" which only had a 20 year copyright period. If first published anywhere else, then it is likely still to be copyrighted in the US because of the URAA. Felix QW ( talk) 18:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Delete nominated image only. Other images mentioned in the discussion were not part of the nomination and not tagged for deletion in any way. Whpq ( talk) 03:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Image of a statue unveiled in 2020. Not an architectural work, so no FoP. Keeping this as a non-free image would probably be against WP:NFLISTS because there is little information in the article about the statue. I propose deletion. ⟲ Three Sixty! Talk? Work. 02:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Additionally, it should be noted that Mgreason also uploaded multiple images of plaques to the article, however I am assuming that these are ineligible for copyright as they consist of only text. -- Fhsig13 ( talk) 05:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 14:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
WP:BANDLOGO disallows non-free logos of music artists "unless the logo itself is discussed in the prose." This file can be replaced by a gallery of c:File:Nice Peter right DigiTour 2011 (cropped).jpg and c:File:Epic Lloyd3.jpg as on List of Epic Rap Battles of History episodes. JohnCWiesenthal ( talk) 04:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
This isn't a free logo and not a suitable license provided. Furthermore, the given source is nowhere seen to have this Image. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 05:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof that this audio sample (i.e. portion of the recording) is contextually significant to either Crowded House (band) or Better Be Home Soon (song). George Ho ( talk) 06:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof that this audio sample (i.e. portion of the recording) is contextually significant to either Crowded House (band) or Don't Stop Now (song). George Ho ( talk) 06:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof that this audio sample (i.e. portion of the recording) is contextually significant to either Crowded House (band) or Distant Sun (song). George Ho ( talk) 06:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free. Whpq ( talk) 17:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright in this image has been restored by the URAA, as Pakistani (and British) copyright periods would still have been running in 1996. The only chance for this image to be considered in the public domain in the US is for it being a British (not Pakistani) Crown image that falls under the special clause that Crown copyright is considered to "expire worldwide" (cf. template:PD-UKGov). However, there is no indication that this is the case. If found to be copyrighted in the US, it could possibly still be used on the subject's article under non-free content provisions, but would presumably have to be removed from Chief of the Air Staff (Pakistan). Felix QW ( talk) 11:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete: Not "own work"; no author info; poorly drawn derivative work Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗ plicit 14:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The event depicted here has always been dated "in the late 1930s", with the date "c. 1920s" added by ShakespeareFan00 in 2014. If it is from the late 1930s, that is, from 1936 or later, its copyright in the US would have been restored by the URAA and would not expire until 95 years after publication. The image is not in use on any pages. Felix QW ( talk) 13:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Due to the slight distortion of the Commons image, I don't think this qualifies for speedy deletion as a duplicate of this Commons version. However, the smaller resolution combined with the bad contrast means that at least for me, there is insufficient added value in retaining this local file. Felix QW ( talk) 15:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned file whose US copyright was renewed by the URAA in 1996. Felix QW ( talk) 15:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned file (disclaimer: It was used in List of hat styles to illustrate the cap, but I replaced in favour of File:Leonid Brezhnev 1974.jpg, where the hat can be seen much better). As a 1947 image from Pakistan, its copyright has been restored by the URAA and will not expire in the US until 2043. Felix QW ( talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The author of this map, taken from a pamphlet whose place of first publication is unclear to me (UK/India/Pakistan), died in 1951, and therefore should have entered the public domain in its source country some time between 2001 and 2021. Due to the URAA, US copyright will in all likelihood last until 2029. As this is a very valuable historic image, I am not sure whether non-free use might be possible; on the other hand, one could draw a free alternative showing the same proposed "states". Felix QW ( talk) 16:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Virtually identical to the original cover, just seems to be a 2D digital image rather than a photo of a box that has this swirl design on it. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 18:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
It is likely that this image is from after 1945 and that therefore it is copyrighted in the US due to URAA restoration. There are PD alternatives for identifying the subject on Commons, so non-free use will be difficult to justify. Felix QW ( talk) 18:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Pakistani image whose copyright has been restored by the URAA. Pakistani government works do not seem to have a rule such as, say, UK Crown works, that the URAA does not apply to them. Felix QW ( talk) 18:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this photo, which was shot in Rome and is sourced to a website of the Australian Olympic Committee, was first published in Pakistan. If it were first published in Italy, then it could be a "simple photo" which only had a 20 year copyright period. If first published anywhere else, then it is likely still to be copyrighted in the US because of the URAA. Felix QW ( talk) 18:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)