The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Support deletion: unused raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes House Blaster talk 00:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Aircraft Command formation Patch.gif Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 01:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:1924 Türkiye şampiyonu Harbiye takımı.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 01:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Non-free Japanese version of a cover. Claimed to be used for primary identification but is not in the infobox. And the cover image is very similar to the cover already in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq ( talk) 03:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
This song sample is stated to be be "For taking an example of this song". That's not an actual purpose. As used, there is no significant sourced commentary to justify the inclusion of this sample. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq ( talk) 03:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Actor
Jason Flemyng portrayed the titular character in only the 2005 remake of
The Quatermass Experiment. The actor hasn't made any subsequent appearances as the character to this date. Furthermore, prior actors portrayed the same character. I don't think the screenshot of the actor is any longer
contextually significant to the character in question. Furthermore, there are free images of Flemyng (in case this screenshot gets deleted) and another actor
Brian Donlevy, one of which I'll use soon.
George Ho (
talk) 03:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC); edited, 03:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hmm... Having second thoughts about the Flemyng image in Commons. That still doesn't ease my concerns about the screenshot. George Ho ( talk) 03:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Per the description, uploaded 10 years ago from http://www.nndb.com/people/641/000103332/ which is Copyright ©2019 Soylent Communications and not CCA-SA 3.0 Step hen 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 18. ✗ plicit 12:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded the title card in 2013 as non-free. Recently changed the status to "PD-ineligible-USonly
": screenshot has plain black background, text unoriginal, typeface well known and not complex. Unsure whether French law can consider the title card copyrightable (
c:COM:France). If not, then transfer the title card to Commons.
George Ho (
talk) 09:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except [[[Man in the Box]] - FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The sample's compliance with NFCC, especially "contextual significance", in the following articles must be evaluated: Alice in Chains, Alternative metal, Facelift (album), Man in the Box. Critical commentary to support it is insufficient in band, genre, and album articles, which may have enough text to convey their own topics without the sample. Unsure whether critical commentary is sufficient in the (main) song article. Just in case, I default to deciding that the song article can convey the understanding of the song without the sample, but I can stand corrected. George Ho ( talk) 07:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 25. MBisanz talk 01:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Come as You Are (Nirvana song) - FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Currently used in American popular music, Come as You Are (Nirvana song), and Nevermind. The genre article uses several samples, and I'm unsure whether the sample of Nirvana's "Come As You Are" is contextually significant to the US pop music genre. I'm unsure as well about its usage in the album article. I think the sample can belong in the song article as it possibly illustrates critical commentary there, but I can stand corrected. George Ho ( talk) 07:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Cropped from somewhere. Source/permission needed. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 15:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. The offending portions were cropped out in File:Iain Pyman winner of the Tusker Kenya Open March 2008 (cropped).jpg - FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The pictured trophy is likely subject to copyright and not considered de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Readers can see in the screenshot a woman standing and another woman lying unconscious. However, the scene can be easily conveyed in text. Also, it doesn't help readers contextually understand the short film as a whole. Just now, I added the film's title card intended for an infobox, so I pushed this longstanding screenshot out into the body of the article. However, I still don't think it improves justification of using the screenshot. Image de-PRODded under assumption that screenshots are acceptable for use in
Template:Infobox film
. However, the infobox instructions doesn't mention any specific screenshot other than a title card, which can be used when an authentic poster or cover art is absent or nonexistent. Neither does
WP:FILMPOSTER nor
WP:FILMNFI. May likely be not
contextually significant.
George Ho (
talk) 23:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Support deletion: unused raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes House Blaster talk 00:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Aircraft Command formation Patch.gif Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 01:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:1924 Türkiye şampiyonu Harbiye takımı.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 01:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Non-free Japanese version of a cover. Claimed to be used for primary identification but is not in the infobox. And the cover image is very similar to the cover already in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq ( talk) 03:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
This song sample is stated to be be "For taking an example of this song". That's not an actual purpose. As used, there is no significant sourced commentary to justify the inclusion of this sample. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq ( talk) 03:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Actor
Jason Flemyng portrayed the titular character in only the 2005 remake of
The Quatermass Experiment. The actor hasn't made any subsequent appearances as the character to this date. Furthermore, prior actors portrayed the same character. I don't think the screenshot of the actor is any longer
contextually significant to the character in question. Furthermore, there are free images of Flemyng (in case this screenshot gets deleted) and another actor
Brian Donlevy, one of which I'll use soon.
George Ho (
talk) 03:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC); edited, 03:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hmm... Having second thoughts about the Flemyng image in Commons. That still doesn't ease my concerns about the screenshot. George Ho ( talk) 03:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Per the description, uploaded 10 years ago from http://www.nndb.com/people/641/000103332/ which is Copyright ©2019 Soylent Communications and not CCA-SA 3.0 Step hen 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 18. ✗ plicit 12:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded the title card in 2013 as non-free. Recently changed the status to "PD-ineligible-USonly
": screenshot has plain black background, text unoriginal, typeface well known and not complex. Unsure whether French law can consider the title card copyrightable (
c:COM:France). If not, then transfer the title card to Commons.
George Ho (
talk) 09:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except [[[Man in the Box]] - FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The sample's compliance with NFCC, especially "contextual significance", in the following articles must be evaluated: Alice in Chains, Alternative metal, Facelift (album), Man in the Box. Critical commentary to support it is insufficient in band, genre, and album articles, which may have enough text to convey their own topics without the sample. Unsure whether critical commentary is sufficient in the (main) song article. Just in case, I default to deciding that the song article can convey the understanding of the song without the sample, but I can stand corrected. George Ho ( talk) 07:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 25. MBisanz talk 01:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Come as You Are (Nirvana song) - FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Currently used in American popular music, Come as You Are (Nirvana song), and Nevermind. The genre article uses several samples, and I'm unsure whether the sample of Nirvana's "Come As You Are" is contextually significant to the US pop music genre. I'm unsure as well about its usage in the album article. I think the sample can belong in the song article as it possibly illustrates critical commentary there, but I can stand corrected. George Ho ( talk) 07:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Cropped from somewhere. Source/permission needed. -- Minorax«¦ talk¦» 15:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete. The offending portions were cropped out in File:Iain Pyman winner of the Tusker Kenya Open March 2008 (cropped).jpg - FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
The pictured trophy is likely subject to copyright and not considered de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 18:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Readers can see in the screenshot a woman standing and another woman lying unconscious. However, the scene can be easily conveyed in text. Also, it doesn't help readers contextually understand the short film as a whole. Just now, I added the film's title card intended for an infobox, so I pushed this longstanding screenshot out into the body of the article. However, I still don't think it improves justification of using the screenshot. Image de-PRODded under assumption that screenshots are acceptable for use in
Template:Infobox film
. However, the infobox instructions doesn't mention any specific screenshot other than a title card, which can be used when an authentic poster or cover art is absent or nonexistent. Neither does
WP:FILMPOSTER nor
WP:FILMNFI. May likely be not
contextually significant.
George Ho (
talk) 23:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)