The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The subject is barely discussed in the article, so it fails NFCC. However, it's possible that the image is PD due to age, we just have absolutely no information on it. Does anyone want to help look? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Purely decorative use, fails NFCC. However, given that the subject died in 1899 it is very possible that this falls under a PD criterion, we just need to find evidence of it. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Claims "a modern replacement would not show the building in a historical context", but unclear what that even means. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Textbook violation of NFCC criteria 3a and 8. May be restored if substantial critical commentary regarding this image is added to the article. - FASTILY 02:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Three covers for one album with no critical commentary, etc. is over the top. WP:NFCC#8. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The subject is barely discussed in the article, so it fails NFCC. However, it's possible that the image is PD due to age, we just have absolutely no information on it. Does anyone want to help look? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Purely decorative use, fails NFCC. However, given that the subject died in 1899 it is very possible that this falls under a PD criterion, we just need to find evidence of it. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Claims "a modern replacement would not show the building in a historical context", but unclear what that even means. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Textbook violation of NFCC criteria 3a and 8. May be restored if substantial critical commentary regarding this image is added to the article. - FASTILY 02:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Three covers for one album with no critical commentary, etc. is over the top. WP:NFCC#8. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)