The result of the discussion was: per nom czar 07:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image of cover art being used in Cyberpunk and Sprawl trilogy. No non-free use rationale has been provided for the stand-alone article about the trilogy, but this type of use of non-free cover art seems acceptable per WP:NFC#cite_note-2 and adding the rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c seems simple enough, but I do have some concerns. This file is a photo taken of the three books together, and I'm not sure if the photo itself would be considered a mechanical reproduction illegible for copyright or a derivative work which is creative enough to require a copyright. This might be moot point because it does appear from the file's description that the person who took the photo has agreed to release it into the public domain, but even so there is no copyright license is provided for the photo. Another possible issue is that stand-alone articles for each of the books show different covers being used for the books. Maybe the trilogy is a set with it's own unique cover art, but I have not been able to find a source for verifying this.
Regarding the use in "Cyberpunk", a non-free use rationale is provided, but this is an article a genre of science fiction and not specifically about the trilogy, so it's non-free use seems to fail WP:NFCC#8, despite the rationale's claim to the contrary. There is no sourced commentary of the cover art of the books anywhere to be found in the article and the trilogy itself is only mentioned by name in the caption add for the file. This type of usage is clearly decorative and does not provide the context required by NFCC#8.
Suggest add for "Sprawl trilogy" along with a rationale for the use to the files page if the photo's licensing and sourcing issues can be resolved. Suggest remove from "Cyberpunk" because the decorative way the file is being used in the article does not comply with WP:NFCC, -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Image is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification but is in fact used in the article with no substantial commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq ( talk) 02:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue of a Liberated Woman.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Random selfie from long-gone editor, who used it mainly for self-promotion (admins see also his deleted contributions) DMacks ( talk) 13:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
WP:V fail (I can't find this as being a current or former flag of the (or some of the) Cayman Islands. "Las Tortugas" seems only historical, no evidence would have had own flag? History of the Cayman Islands and Cayman Brac say that this name was only used before 1586. DMacks ( talk) 13:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Claimed as PD-US due to pre-1923 publication. However, since the relevant subject of the photo, Charles Aznavour, was not born until 1924, this can't be the case. First reported publication is 1976, so this photo is presumably still under copyright. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. ( talk) 15:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: use free use equivalent from commons:Category:Anaconda Smelter Stack czar 07:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image of a smokestack which is still standing in a state park. The stated purpose of the image is to include an unobstructed view of the base. As the structure is still standing, one could create an equivalent free image. Fails WP:NFCC#1 Whpq ( talk) 21:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: per nom czar 07:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image of cover art being used in Cyberpunk and Sprawl trilogy. No non-free use rationale has been provided for the stand-alone article about the trilogy, but this type of use of non-free cover art seems acceptable per WP:NFC#cite_note-2 and adding the rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c seems simple enough, but I do have some concerns. This file is a photo taken of the three books together, and I'm not sure if the photo itself would be considered a mechanical reproduction illegible for copyright or a derivative work which is creative enough to require a copyright. This might be moot point because it does appear from the file's description that the person who took the photo has agreed to release it into the public domain, but even so there is no copyright license is provided for the photo. Another possible issue is that stand-alone articles for each of the books show different covers being used for the books. Maybe the trilogy is a set with it's own unique cover art, but I have not been able to find a source for verifying this.
Regarding the use in "Cyberpunk", a non-free use rationale is provided, but this is an article a genre of science fiction and not specifically about the trilogy, so it's non-free use seems to fail WP:NFCC#8, despite the rationale's claim to the contrary. There is no sourced commentary of the cover art of the books anywhere to be found in the article and the trilogy itself is only mentioned by name in the caption add for the file. This type of usage is clearly decorative and does not provide the context required by NFCC#8.
Suggest add for "Sprawl trilogy" along with a rationale for the use to the files page if the photo's licensing and sourcing issues can be resolved. Suggest remove from "Cyberpunk" because the decorative way the file is being used in the article does not comply with WP:NFCC, -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Image is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification but is in fact used in the article with no substantial commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq ( talk) 02:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue of a Liberated Woman.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 04:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Random selfie from long-gone editor, who used it mainly for self-promotion (admins see also his deleted contributions) DMacks ( talk) 13:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
WP:V fail (I can't find this as being a current or former flag of the (or some of the) Cayman Islands. "Las Tortugas" seems only historical, no evidence would have had own flag? History of the Cayman Islands and Cayman Brac say that this name was only used before 1586. DMacks ( talk) 13:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Claimed as PD-US due to pre-1923 publication. However, since the relevant subject of the photo, Charles Aznavour, was not born until 1924, this can't be the case. First reported publication is 1976, so this photo is presumably still under copyright. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. ( talk) 15:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: use free use equivalent from commons:Category:Anaconda Smelter Stack czar 07:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image of a smokestack which is still standing in a state park. The stated purpose of the image is to include an unobstructed view of the base. As the structure is still standing, one could create an equivalent free image. Fails WP:NFCC#1 Whpq ( talk) 21:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)