The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused; superseded by File:EME that.svg. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 03:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted image by photographer Deidhra Fahey ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 07:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Image is being used in an image gallery at Haymarket - Boston. This does not meet WP:NFCC#8 as the lack of this image of a proposed hotel is not detrimental to the reader's understanding of the open air market which is the primary topic. Whpq ( talk) 12:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I respectfully disagree. As the "Future" section of the article explains, the proposed Haymarket Square Hotel project would include a reconstruction of Blackstone Street and a complete redesign of the current market. Showing an image of the proposed hotel would help readers understand the scale of the hotel and its impact on Haymarket. NewtonCourt ( talk) 15:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
It is used to illustrate an article on a temple, but does not indicate why it is relevant. No source. Image has a border and no exif, also leading me to think it could have been taken off a website. Deadstar ( talk) 14:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
This seems to be a backdoor way of getting a deleted article back on Wikipedia. The associated article Silvano Bortolazzi was deleted at AfD, unanimously, and was deleted again via CSD G4. This .pdf is nothing more than a backdoor attempt to reinstate an article that has been roundly rejected by the Wikipedia community. Safiel ( talk) 18:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Yes, what is the reason for deleting both article and this file? Is this just a veto action? First tell the cause of deletion of article. If there is no cause, how can it be used to vindicate the status of a file? How does a file with reliable citations in it just be eligible for deletion? Is deletion a game? AnjaliWasim ( talk) 13:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
"Because it's spam, please refrain from going on spamming Bortolazzi again. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)" How was it decided that Silvano Bortolazzi article posted in March 2016 is a "spam"? It could be nice if any of you could clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnjaliWasim ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
AnjaliWasim ( talk) 13:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
I close my talk. The users here may do as they wish, without citing any valid reasons. (as they have been) Kiron Krishnan ( talk) 17:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC) (Also note I have deleted all my previous comments here too. I realize it is impossible to delete a wiki account. So, I would better leave like this) Kiron Krishnan ( talk) 18:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
This logo seems to be incorrect, based on what is said on this URL. The correct version is already on Commons under this name ( commons:File:Traviangames logo.png) so deleting the local copy should suffice at fixing the issue unless there are doubts about the licensing of the Commons copy. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused; superseded by File:EME that.svg. — Granger ( talk · contribs) 03:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted image by photographer Deidhra Fahey ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 07:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Image is being used in an image gallery at Haymarket - Boston. This does not meet WP:NFCC#8 as the lack of this image of a proposed hotel is not detrimental to the reader's understanding of the open air market which is the primary topic. Whpq ( talk) 12:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I respectfully disagree. As the "Future" section of the article explains, the proposed Haymarket Square Hotel project would include a reconstruction of Blackstone Street and a complete redesign of the current market. Showing an image of the proposed hotel would help readers understand the scale of the hotel and its impact on Haymarket. NewtonCourt ( talk) 15:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
It is used to illustrate an article on a temple, but does not indicate why it is relevant. No source. Image has a border and no exif, also leading me to think it could have been taken off a website. Deadstar ( talk) 14:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
This seems to be a backdoor way of getting a deleted article back on Wikipedia. The associated article Silvano Bortolazzi was deleted at AfD, unanimously, and was deleted again via CSD G4. This .pdf is nothing more than a backdoor attempt to reinstate an article that has been roundly rejected by the Wikipedia community. Safiel ( talk) 18:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Yes, what is the reason for deleting both article and this file? Is this just a veto action? First tell the cause of deletion of article. If there is no cause, how can it be used to vindicate the status of a file? How does a file with reliable citations in it just be eligible for deletion? Is deletion a game? AnjaliWasim ( talk) 13:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
"Because it's spam, please refrain from going on spamming Bortolazzi again. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)" How was it decided that Silvano Bortolazzi article posted in March 2016 is a "spam"? It could be nice if any of you could clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnjaliWasim ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
AnjaliWasim ( talk) 13:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
I close my talk. The users here may do as they wish, without citing any valid reasons. (as they have been) Kiron Krishnan ( talk) 17:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC) (Also note I have deleted all my previous comments here too. I realize it is impossible to delete a wiki account. So, I would better leave like this) Kiron Krishnan ( talk) 18:15, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
This logo seems to be incorrect, based on what is said on this URL. The correct version is already on Commons under this name ( commons:File:Traviangames logo.png) so deleting the local copy should suffice at fixing the issue unless there are doubts about the licensing of the Commons copy. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)