The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Uploader identifies the photo as coming from their "personal family collection", and provides no evidence to support the PD claim. Ownership of a physical copy of the photo does not demonstrate ownership of the relevant copyrights. A late-in-life photo of a subject who died in 1948 cannot be presumed to be public domain. Without information as to the photographer, previous publication, if any, and the date when and jurisdiction where the photo was taken. it can't be assumed to be public domain. The copyright here is likely either life of the photographer plus 70 years, or, if this is considered work-made-for-hire commissioned by the subject, life of the subject plus 70 years, assuming US law controls. The subject died in 1948, so the image would not become PD in that case until 2018. With the photographer unidentified, the PD date for that case can't be determined. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 12:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
There's no "automatic" entitlement to the use of non-free episode screenshots in an episode article in a way there is for (say) an album cover in an album article. It is not clear what this image is meant to be adding to the article; the scene and premise can be easily envisaged without the use of a non-free image. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
There's no "automatic" entitlement to the use of non-free episode screenshots in an episode article in a way there is for (say) an album cover in an album article. It is not clear what this image is meant to be adding to the article; the scene and premise can be easily envisaged without the use of a non-free image. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Uploader identifies the photo as coming from their "personal family collection", and provides no evidence to support the PD claim. Ownership of a physical copy of the photo does not demonstrate ownership of the relevant copyrights. A late-in-life photo of a subject who died in 1948 cannot be presumed to be public domain. Without information as to the photographer, previous publication, if any, and the date when and jurisdiction where the photo was taken. it can't be assumed to be public domain. The copyright here is likely either life of the photographer plus 70 years, or, if this is considered work-made-for-hire commissioned by the subject, life of the subject plus 70 years, assuming US law controls. The subject died in 1948, so the image would not become PD in that case until 2018. With the photographer unidentified, the PD date for that case can't be determined. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 12:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
There's no "automatic" entitlement to the use of non-free episode screenshots in an episode article in a way there is for (say) an album cover in an album article. It is not clear what this image is meant to be adding to the article; the scene and premise can be easily envisaged without the use of a non-free image. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
There's no "automatic" entitlement to the use of non-free episode screenshots in an episode article in a way there is for (say) an album cover in an album article. It is not clear what this image is meant to be adding to the article; the scene and premise can be easily envisaged without the use of a non-free image. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)