< October 13 | October 15 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Screenshot showing the protagonist of a movie, used in movie article in addition to an infobox film poster showing the same person. Not the object of specific commentary; illustrates nothing that the poster doesn't already illustrate just as well. Fails NFCC#8+3. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned signature of non-notable individual, so no reason to keep around. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image used to illustrate four living individuals. Can be replaced by freely licensed image. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Consensus has swung in the post few months against alternative covers, especially ones almost identical to the original ones. Therefore I posit that this is an inappropriate use for a fair use image. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
< October 13 | October 15 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Screenshot showing the protagonist of a movie, used in movie article in addition to an infobox film poster showing the same person. Not the object of specific commentary; illustrates nothing that the poster doesn't already illustrate just as well. Fails NFCC#8+3. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Invalid FUR--not necessary to understand the subject. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 09:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Orphaned signature of non-notable individual, so no reason to keep around. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-free image used to illustrate four living individuals. Can be replaced by freely licensed image. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Consensus has swung in the post few months against alternative covers, especially ones almost identical to the original ones. Therefore I posit that this is an inappropriate use for a fair use image. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply