August 27
File:Othello Bouchet and Gonzalez.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Othello Bouchet and Gonzalez.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ItsLassieTime ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
non-free image used as illustration in a gallery - adds little to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fwwm1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Fwwm1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J.D. ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails FUC#8. Only used in plot, no contextual significance that cannot be explained with text only. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Australia's Next Top Model 3 Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Australia's Next Top Model 3 Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, unused only with not as parent article. ApprenticeFan work 08:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Australia's Next Top Model 4 Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Australia's Next Top Model 4 Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, unused only with not as parent article. ApprenticeFan work 08:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Australia's Next Top Model 5 Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Australia's Next Top Model 5 Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, unused only with not as parent article. ApprenticeFan work 08:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:LOST Season 3 Episode 1 - The Others' Camp and smoke from Oceanic Flight 815.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:LOST Season 3 Episode 1 - The Others' Camp and smoke from Oceanic Flight 815.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dandv ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Stereotyped, completely generic FUR lacking any reference to the actual contents of the picture and the article. Not the object of analytical commentary; even the link between the image caption and the plot summary is tenuous. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Please indicate an AfD for this. See also
my comment on the nom's talk page. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 09:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- "an AfD"? The deletion discussion is right here. In response to your question: a FUR for a TV screenshot must individually explain why this particular shot is necessary to adequately understand the article. I see you have now added some more text, but I can still see no explanation why this shot couldn't simply be replaced with a textual description. Also, forget about the boilerplate "Helps the user quickly know they have found the episode they are looking for" – that never works.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 09:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- How did it work for the previous screenshot then, which had been there for years? Are you going to reply with
WP:OSE? No point in discussing then, as I'd never manage to convince you. You might as well go delete all the screenshots from
all Lost episodes, because they could simply be replaced with a textual description. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- It didn't work for the old one either. I'd nominate that one too if somebody were to restore it to the article. The problem is, NFC misuse is so rampant in TV episode articles, it is indeed true that a very large part of these infobox images ought to be deleted. The number is so big that nobody has managed to keep up with deleting them, and some series have escaped proper scrutiny more than others. I generally nominate only those that I come across during routine recent-uploads patrol. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- How did it work for the previous screenshot then, which had been there for years? Are you going to reply with
WP:OSE? No point in discussing then, as I'd never manage to convince you. You might as well go delete all the screenshots from
all Lost episodes, because they could simply be replaced with a textual description. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- "an AfD"? The deletion discussion is right here. In response to your question: a FUR for a TV screenshot must individually explain why this particular shot is necessary to adequately understand the article. I see you have now added some more text, but I can still see no explanation why this shot couldn't simply be replaced with a textual description. Also, forget about the boilerplate "Helps the user quickly know they have found the episode they are looking for" – that never works.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 09:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Please indicate an AfD for this. See also
my comment on the nom's talk page. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 09:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as it does not indicate contextual significance. If I look at that, I think "oh, Temanggung", not "oh, Lost". No in-text discussion either. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Lost was filmed in
Oahu, not in Indonesia. Respectfully, please abstain from discussing the deletion if you don't have knowledge of the topic. Also, I have updated both
the article text and the file description to make the connection very clear. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- I know it wasn't filmed in Indonesia. That's my way of indirectly saying "such a picture could have been shot anywhere" (i.e. very generic). Kindly assume good faith and noted that FFDs are open for all to discuss. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 10:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The two smoke trails should indicate the screenshot isn't of some ordinary tropical island. Perhaps they were too small, due to the anal low-resolution copyright requirements (as if ABC would object for Lost to be featured with images on Wikipedia). Anyway, looks like I stand no chance in this debate, so I'll give up. Do with the screenshot as you wish. -- Dandv( talk| contribs) 13:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Lost was filmed in
Oahu, not in Indonesia. Respectfully, please abstain from discussing the deletion if you don't have knowledge of the topic. Also, I have updated both
the article text and the file description to make the connection very clear. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Delete The image shows just a piece of nature. You could visit the same location and take a free photo of this location instead. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 08:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Maunsellp.214.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted - may be undeleted in 2022. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Maunsellp.214.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RoslynSKP ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Though it is old, I can't see any reason to assume that this is in the public domain in the UK, or that it was in the public domain in 1996- as such, it probably is not PD in the US. J Milburn ( talk) 08:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Comment The image appears to have been taken from this book, which was published privately by members of the British Army in 1926. Unless the author of the book died in that year, it won't have been PD in 1996. Nick-D ( talk) 09:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- I gave this one a good look because we have several of his images. I can't find anything about the man: not what his full name was, nor even what nationality he is (the
14th Prince of Wales's Own Scinde Horse being British Indian), nor when he died (fairly important because the URAA would restore this to 2021 only). The publisher was apparently the private "Regimental Committee" which I examined in the hope it might be part of the British government. I can't find anything solid, but it's actually quite promising. I'm not great on Crown Copyright, but the Regimental Committee appears to be some part of the unit, officially (based on similar things in other units). Worth investigation by someone with better military knowledge. Grandiose (
me,
talk,
contribs) 12:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- The "Regimental committee" is likely to be an informal private group; I don't think it can reasonably be considered a Crown Copyright work.
- "Maunsell, E. B." is in the 1912 Indian Army List as a captain in the 35th Scinde Horse, and is almost certainly the same man. Commissioned 1897, and an index entry gives him as Eustace Ball, born 11 Oct 1878. There is a probate record for Eustace Ball Maunsell, East Budleigh, Devon, d. 1936. So if Maunsell drew the map himself, it's out of copyright under life+70. (If the illustrations were made by someone else, you're stuck.) Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ordereusebeia.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Ordereusebeia.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JoelStephenWilliams ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, self-created logo for a non-notable religious group. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 16:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Newright.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Newright.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tasha Henderson ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused logo, and a possible copyright infringement: it's tagged {{ PD-self}}, but a source URL is given. — Bkell ( talk) 16:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:PlotBot Screenshot.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:PlotBot Screenshot.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ottovonguericke ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused screenshot of a Web page. The content in the screenshot is apparently licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license, but "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. — Bkell ( talk) 16:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Testyyyy.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Testyyyy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ColWilliam ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused test image. — Bkell ( talk) 16:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Development center.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Development center.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Arpitha aradhya ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused image with no context for encyclopedic use. Possibly a copyright violation; the summary says " www.scii.in" and there is no evidence that this source releases content under CC-BY-SA-3.0 or GFDL as claimed. — Bkell ( talk) 16:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Windows Live Devices logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Windows Live Devices logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Damaster98 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo used within Windows Live Devices, although no longer the logo used for the service following a redesign. I'd suggest the logo now has a solely decorative use within the article, and is not required. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Keep - The logo serves a purpose of purporting the history of the Windows Live Devices service, even when the logo is no longer officially used by Microsoft, and is also appropriately placed in the History section of the article. Just because something is no longer in use or current does not mean that it should be removed from Wikipedia. -- Damaster98 ( talk) 23:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- It isn't referred to within the text as yet, so is currently fulfilling a decorative use, which is not allowed in the non-free rules. Cloudbound ( talk) 12:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Kramond3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Kramond3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ruuy lestrade 73 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Without description, unlikely to be used, unused. Bulwersator ( talk) 21:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
August 27
File:Othello Bouchet and Gonzalez.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Othello Bouchet and Gonzalez.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ItsLassieTime ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
non-free image used as illustration in a gallery - adds little to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 00:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Fwwm1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Fwwm1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J.D. ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails FUC#8. Only used in plot, no contextual significance that cannot be explained with text only. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Australia's Next Top Model 3 Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Australia's Next Top Model 3 Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, unused only with not as parent article. ApprenticeFan work 08:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Australia's Next Top Model 4 Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Australia's Next Top Model 4 Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, unused only with not as parent article. ApprenticeFan work 08:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Australia's Next Top Model 5 Logo.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Australia's Next Top Model 5 Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lakeyboy ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, unused only with not as parent article. ApprenticeFan work 08:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:LOST Season 3 Episode 1 - The Others' Camp and smoke from Oceanic Flight 815.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:LOST Season 3 Episode 1 - The Others' Camp and smoke from Oceanic Flight 815.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dandv ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Stereotyped, completely generic FUR lacking any reference to the actual contents of the picture and the article. Not the object of analytical commentary; even the link between the image caption and the plot summary is tenuous. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Please indicate an AfD for this. See also
my comment on the nom's talk page. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 09:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- "an AfD"? The deletion discussion is right here. In response to your question: a FUR for a TV screenshot must individually explain why this particular shot is necessary to adequately understand the article. I see you have now added some more text, but I can still see no explanation why this shot couldn't simply be replaced with a textual description. Also, forget about the boilerplate "Helps the user quickly know they have found the episode they are looking for" – that never works.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 09:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- How did it work for the previous screenshot then, which had been there for years? Are you going to reply with
WP:OSE? No point in discussing then, as I'd never manage to convince you. You might as well go delete all the screenshots from
all Lost episodes, because they could simply be replaced with a textual description. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- It didn't work for the old one either. I'd nominate that one too if somebody were to restore it to the article. The problem is, NFC misuse is so rampant in TV episode articles, it is indeed true that a very large part of these infobox images ought to be deleted. The number is so big that nobody has managed to keep up with deleting them, and some series have escaped proper scrutiny more than others. I generally nominate only those that I come across during routine recent-uploads patrol. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- How did it work for the previous screenshot then, which had been there for years? Are you going to reply with
WP:OSE? No point in discussing then, as I'd never manage to convince you. You might as well go delete all the screenshots from
all Lost episodes, because they could simply be replaced with a textual description. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- "an AfD"? The deletion discussion is right here. In response to your question: a FUR for a TV screenshot must individually explain why this particular shot is necessary to adequately understand the article. I see you have now added some more text, but I can still see no explanation why this shot couldn't simply be replaced with a textual description. Also, forget about the boilerplate "Helps the user quickly know they have found the episode they are looking for" – that never works.
Fut.Perf.
☼ 09:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Please indicate an AfD for this. See also
my comment on the nom's talk page. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 09:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as it does not indicate contextual significance. If I look at that, I think "oh, Temanggung", not "oh, Lost". No in-text discussion either. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Lost was filmed in
Oahu, not in Indonesia. Respectfully, please abstain from discussing the deletion if you don't have knowledge of the topic. Also, I have updated both
the article text and the file description to make the connection very clear. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- I know it wasn't filmed in Indonesia. That's my way of indirectly saying "such a picture could have been shot anywhere" (i.e. very generic). Kindly assume good faith and noted that FFDs are open for all to discuss. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 10:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The two smoke trails should indicate the screenshot isn't of some ordinary tropical island. Perhaps they were too small, due to the anal low-resolution copyright requirements (as if ABC would object for Lost to be featured with images on Wikipedia). Anyway, looks like I stand no chance in this debate, so I'll give up. Do with the screenshot as you wish. -- Dandv( talk| contribs) 13:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Lost was filmed in
Oahu, not in Indonesia. Respectfully, please abstain from discussing the deletion if you don't have knowledge of the topic. Also, I have updated both
the article text and the file description to make the connection very clear. --
Dandv(
talk|
contribs) 10:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- Delete The image shows just a piece of nature. You could visit the same location and take a free photo of this location instead. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 08:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Maunsellp.214.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted - may be undeleted in 2022. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:23, 4 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Maunsellp.214.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RoslynSKP ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Though it is old, I can't see any reason to assume that this is in the public domain in the UK, or that it was in the public domain in 1996- as such, it probably is not PD in the US. J Milburn ( talk) 08:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Comment The image appears to have been taken from this book, which was published privately by members of the British Army in 1926. Unless the author of the book died in that year, it won't have been PD in 1996. Nick-D ( talk) 09:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- I gave this one a good look because we have several of his images. I can't find anything about the man: not what his full name was, nor even what nationality he is (the
14th Prince of Wales's Own Scinde Horse being British Indian), nor when he died (fairly important because the URAA would restore this to 2021 only). The publisher was apparently the private "Regimental Committee" which I examined in the hope it might be part of the British government. I can't find anything solid, but it's actually quite promising. I'm not great on Crown Copyright, but the Regimental Committee appears to be some part of the unit, officially (based on similar things in other units). Worth investigation by someone with better military knowledge. Grandiose (
me,
talk,
contribs) 12:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
reply
- The "Regimental committee" is likely to be an informal private group; I don't think it can reasonably be considered a Crown Copyright work.
- "Maunsell, E. B." is in the 1912 Indian Army List as a captain in the 35th Scinde Horse, and is almost certainly the same man. Commissioned 1897, and an index entry gives him as Eustace Ball, born 11 Oct 1878. There is a probate record for Eustace Ball Maunsell, East Budleigh, Devon, d. 1936. So if Maunsell drew the map himself, it's out of copyright under life+70. (If the illustrations were made by someone else, you're stuck.) Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
File:Ordereusebeia.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Ordereusebeia.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JoelStephenWilliams ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, self-created logo for a non-notable religious group. No encyclopedic use. — Bkell ( talk) 16:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Newright.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Newright.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tasha Henderson ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused logo, and a possible copyright infringement: it's tagged {{ PD-self}}, but a source URL is given. — Bkell ( talk) 16:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:PlotBot Screenshot.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:PlotBot Screenshot.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ottovonguericke ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused screenshot of a Web page. The content in the screenshot is apparently licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license, but "NonCommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. — Bkell ( talk) 16:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Testyyyy.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Testyyyy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ColWilliam ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused test image. — Bkell ( talk) 16:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Development center.JPG
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Development center.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Arpitha aradhya ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused image with no context for encyclopedic use. Possibly a copyright violation; the summary says " www.scii.in" and there is no evidence that this source releases content under CC-BY-SA-3.0 or GFDL as claimed. — Bkell ( talk) 16:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Windows Live Devices logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Windows Live Devices logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Damaster98 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free logo used within Windows Live Devices, although no longer the logo used for the service following a redesign. I'd suggest the logo now has a solely decorative use within the article, and is not required. Cloudbound ( talk) 18:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- Keep - The logo serves a purpose of purporting the history of the Windows Live Devices service, even when the logo is no longer officially used by Microsoft, and is also appropriately placed in the History section of the article. Just because something is no longer in use or current does not mean that it should be removed from Wikipedia. -- Damaster98 ( talk) 23:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- It isn't referred to within the text as yet, so is currently fulfilling a decorative use, which is not allowed in the non-free rules. Cloudbound ( talk) 12:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Kramond3.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC) reply
- File:Kramond3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ruuy lestrade 73 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Without description, unlikely to be used, unused. Bulwersator ( talk) 21:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.