The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Lower resolution lossy version of File:Delhi University's official logo.png Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete Wknight94 talk 13:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot. Random scene, showing two characters talking in a nondescript situation. Not embedded in analytical commentary, no signs of being particularly recognisable or representative of the episode, not the object of explicit discussion, not needed for understanding the article. The FUR claims part of its use is to show one character is wearing a particular kind of T-shirt. That, surely, is a new low in NFCC#8 arguments. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - sole editor seeking to keep the image has not addressed the deletion rationale. I also note that EBE123 has removed the image from the article in the past day or so - Peripitus (Talk) 10:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free episode screenshot of a cartoon series. Not embedded in analytical commentary, not needed to understand anything in the article. Purely decorative infobox use. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot from a cartoon series. Apparently random scene, not the object of analytical commentary, not needed to understand the article, purely decorative infobox use. Article consists mostly of an almost unreadable, extremely poor quality plot renarration. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 10:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright infringement davephoenix.com 86.5.70.111 ( talk) 16:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Lower resolution lossy version of File:Delhi University's official logo.png Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete Wknight94 talk 13:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot. Random scene, showing two characters talking in a nondescript situation. Not embedded in analytical commentary, no signs of being particularly recognisable or representative of the episode, not the object of explicit discussion, not needed for understanding the article. The FUR claims part of its use is to show one character is wearing a particular kind of T-shirt. That, surely, is a new low in NFCC#8 arguments. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - sole editor seeking to keep the image has not addressed the deletion rationale. I also note that EBE123 has removed the image from the article in the past day or so - Peripitus (Talk) 10:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free episode screenshot of a cartoon series. Not embedded in analytical commentary, not needed to understand anything in the article. Purely decorative infobox use. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-free TV episode screenshot from a cartoon series. Apparently random scene, not the object of analytical commentary, not needed to understand the article, purely decorative infobox use. Article consists mostly of an almost unreadable, extremely poor quality plot renarration. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 10:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright infringement davephoenix.com 86.5.70.111 ( talk) 16:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC) reply