The result of the discussion was: delete. Derivative work. - Nv8200p talk 20:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a photograph taken from my Jeep next to the sign during a trip to and from Bella Coola. I removed a tiny bit of perspective distortion from the image and cropped it to the edges. If you folks think that a photograph of an informational road sign taken in British Columbia for editorial purposes isn't fair use, you need to go back to copyright school. Joseph N Hall ( talk) 02:32, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. As the image has been added to an article that relates to the image and the text is specific about the image and misidentification of the animal in the image, the image is significant to the article. - Nv8200p talk 15:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks THOR, I never seen that one it was a good find I would have been in a lawsuit!-- ChubsterII ( talk) 12:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
How has this image not been deleted yet? DreamGuy ( talk) 23:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Since it was orphaned again I did some digging and found an article that is referring to it.-- ChubsterII ( talk) 11:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted, seeing an ID card created at age 2 to illustrate the article about the crime that befell her ~13 (or whatever) years later in no way increase the readers understanding of that article. By all means cite the ID card as a source for her date of birth, but using the image inline in the article quite clearly fail the non-free content criteria. -- Sherool (talk) 04:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. Derivative work. - Nv8200p talk 20:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC) reply
This is a photograph taken from my Jeep next to the sign during a trip to and from Bella Coola. I removed a tiny bit of perspective distortion from the image and cropped it to the edges. If you folks think that a photograph of an informational road sign taken in British Columbia for editorial purposes isn't fair use, you need to go back to copyright school. Joseph N Hall ( talk) 02:32, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. As the image has been added to an article that relates to the image and the text is specific about the image and misidentification of the animal in the image, the image is significant to the article. - Nv8200p talk 15:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Thanks THOR, I never seen that one it was a good find I would have been in a lawsuit!-- ChubsterII ( talk) 12:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply
How has this image not been deleted yet? DreamGuy ( talk) 23:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Since it was orphaned again I did some digging and found an article that is referring to it.-- ChubsterII ( talk) 11:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted, seeing an ID card created at age 2 to illustrate the article about the crime that befell her ~13 (or whatever) years later in no way increase the readers understanding of that article. By all means cite the ID card as a source for her date of birth, but using the image inline in the article quite clearly fail the non-free content criteria. -- Sherool (talk) 04:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply