From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 8

Image:Homosexual scene - 420 BCE, Dinos painter - Capua - GR 1772.3-20.154 F65 - British Museum.jpg

Image:Homosexual scene - 420 BCE, Dinos painter - Capua - GR 1772.3-20.154 F65 - British Museum.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allstarecho ( notify | contribs).
  • The picture is licensed as {{ PD-BritishGov}}, but I see no reason why. The pictures comes from the British Museum. I don't know whether a NDPB qualifies as “the United Kingdom Government”. Plus we cannot know if the picture was taken more than 50 years ago. Jastrow ( Λέγετε) 08:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I'm not au fait with the situation, but isn't this a 2-dimensional work of art by an artist m ore than 70 years dead, or is that irrelevant? athinaios | Talk 08:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
It's a detail from a krater (a kind of large vase), so the PD-art license cannot apply IMO. On a side note, this is a low-quality picture of a well-known vase. The best solution would be that a London-dwelling Wikipedian hop into the British Museum (entrance is free) and shoot a picture. Jastrow ( Λέγετε) 16:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
A crater isn't 2-dimensional. It's 3-dimensional. And this Image isn't 50 years or more old. Also the description is a problem. Silly talking without really deep going informations, in parts at the end false informations. delete. Marcus Cyron ( talk) 17:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Commons image showing through. - Nv8200p talk 03:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Deleted on Commons. Jastrow ( Λέγετε) 12:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Unicursalhex1.gif

Image:Unicursalhex1.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arthur_Warrington_Thomas ( notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, no description or context. Kelly hi! 17:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 8

Image:Homosexual scene - 420 BCE, Dinos painter - Capua - GR 1772.3-20.154 F65 - British Museum.jpg

Image:Homosexual scene - 420 BCE, Dinos painter - Capua - GR 1772.3-20.154 F65 - British Museum.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allstarecho ( notify | contribs).
  • The picture is licensed as {{ PD-BritishGov}}, but I see no reason why. The pictures comes from the British Museum. I don't know whether a NDPB qualifies as “the United Kingdom Government”. Plus we cannot know if the picture was taken more than 50 years ago. Jastrow ( Λέγετε) 08:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I'm not au fait with the situation, but isn't this a 2-dimensional work of art by an artist m ore than 70 years dead, or is that irrelevant? athinaios | Talk 08:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
It's a detail from a krater (a kind of large vase), so the PD-art license cannot apply IMO. On a side note, this is a low-quality picture of a well-known vase. The best solution would be that a London-dwelling Wikipedian hop into the British Museum (entrance is free) and shoot a picture. Jastrow ( Λέγετε) 16:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
A crater isn't 2-dimensional. It's 3-dimensional. And this Image isn't 50 years or more old. Also the description is a problem. Silly talking without really deep going informations, in parts at the end false informations. delete. Marcus Cyron ( talk) 17:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Commons image showing through. - Nv8200p talk 03:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Deleted on Commons. Jastrow ( Λέγετε) 12:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Image:Unicursalhex1.gif

Image:Unicursalhex1.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arthur_Warrington_Thomas ( notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, no description or context. Kelly hi! 17:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook