orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, question license
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 00:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikly uploader has ability to license as GFDL given it is the school's logo per school's webpage
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 00:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, absent uploader, licensed as GFDL but text added by uploader indicates to "ask before using"
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 00:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
It was probably used in the article
Monte Ne, based on the name and on the uploader's other contributions. The current version of
Monte Ne has better photos, and there doesn't appear to be a need for this photo, so there's no harm in deleting it. (As an aside, the graffiti really makes things look bad there. So much for historic preservation.) --
Elkman(Elkspeak) 17:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, does not appear have an encyclopedic use
Butseriouslyfolks 03:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, uploader's sole contribution, encyclopedic value unknown.
Butseriouslyfolks 04:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic user photo, one of user's two contribs.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic user photo, one of user's two contribs.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, probably Unencyclopedic, artistic photo of nonnotable musician.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, poor quality, does not have any obvious encyclopedic use.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned. Low quality image looks like hell. Obsoleted by
Image:John C. Reilly.jpg. Earlier request for deletion by image's author
user:Cnota was opposed only by me (since the image had an encyclopedic use at the time). —
Stevecudmore 05:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader
MER-C 11:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I know the person who uploaded this, I also know the photographer. They are not the same and the uploader does not have permission from the Photographer. Also the uploader does a rather mean blow at the photographer. Unused also. —
Taggard (
Complain) 12:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Please ignore this. The person who uploaded it has expressed that it is ok to be on Wikipedia. —
Taggard (
Complain) 23:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
As an unnecessary, duplicitive,
non-free image, it only serves to further identify the fictional character. — pd_THOR|=/\= | 13:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination as this is now the sole image performing its function. — pd_THOR|=/\= | 01:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. I replaced the promotional picture in the infobox with this one, which we have better fair use claim on, being only a small portion of the copyrighted work (the film) as a whole. howcheng {
chat} 00:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: orphan.) --
Aarktica 16:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used as part of spamming campaign. —
Calton |
Talk 16:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: orphan.) --
Aarktica 16:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used as part of spamming campaign. —
Calton |
Talk 16:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unnecessary unfree image showing three musicians, aparently being used to illustrate the information that theses three musicians pplayed together once, doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali(
talk) 17:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 19:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
This image was uploaded for the sole intention of accusing this non-notable young lady of being a porn star, as a form of 13-year-old libel --
Milton 19:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unencyclopedic orphan image of a non-notable person. —
Matt57(
talk•
contribs) 22:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC).reply
This is a POV issue. Matt wants to remove this person's image and arguments from Wikipedia because Matt says he's not a reliable source. We're in the process of establishing whether he is. Regardless, there's no reason to delete the image because it has a free license.
SlimVirgin(talk) 23:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
A free license doesnt mean that an image can stay. I thought as an administrator you would know that. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of content - that includes images. --
Matt57(
talk•
contribs) 23:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
You don't understand. It's on the Commons, so it can be deleted from here, because we'll still have access to it for the article, if needed.
SlimVirgin(talk)
Then whats the use of the deletion process here, if an image can still stay on the Commons? Do they have their own deletion process? --
Matt57(
talk•
contribs) 03:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, seems to be advertising. —
Bkell (
talk) 23:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, seems to be advertising. Obnoxious flashing version of the previous entry. —
Bkell (
talk) 23:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-free image. The source copyright policy contradicts the used tag: derivative work is not authorized. Cannot be re-tagged into fair use: it is a drawing, reproducible by a wikipedian from descriptions `'
юзырь:mikka 23:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, question license
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 00:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, absent uploader, unlikly uploader has ability to license as GFDL given it is the school's logo per school's webpage
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 00:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, absent uploader, licensed as GFDL but text added by uploader indicates to "ask before using"
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 00:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
It was probably used in the article
Monte Ne, based on the name and on the uploader's other contributions. The current version of
Monte Ne has better photos, and there doesn't appear to be a need for this photo, so there's no harm in deleting it. (As an aside, the graffiti really makes things look bad there. So much for historic preservation.) --
Elkman(Elkspeak) 17:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, does not appear have an encyclopedic use
Butseriouslyfolks 03:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, uploader's sole contribution, encyclopedic value unknown.
Butseriouslyfolks 04:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic user photo, one of user's two contribs.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic user photo, one of user's two contribs.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, probably Unencyclopedic, artistic photo of nonnotable musician.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, poor quality, does not have any obvious encyclopedic use.
Butseriouslyfolks 05:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned. Low quality image looks like hell. Obsoleted by
Image:John C. Reilly.jpg. Earlier request for deletion by image's author
user:Cnota was opposed only by me (since the image had an encyclopedic use at the time). —
Stevecudmore 05:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphaned Unencyclopedic Absent uploader
MER-C 11:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I know the person who uploaded this, I also know the photographer. They are not the same and the uploader does not have permission from the Photographer. Also the uploader does a rather mean blow at the photographer. Unused also. —
Taggard (
Complain) 12:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Please ignore this. The person who uploaded it has expressed that it is ok to be on Wikipedia. —
Taggard (
Complain) 23:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
As an unnecessary, duplicitive,
non-free image, it only serves to further identify the fictional character. — pd_THOR|=/\= | 13:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination as this is now the sole image performing its function. — pd_THOR|=/\= | 01:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. I replaced the promotional picture in the infobox with this one, which we have better fair use claim on, being only a small portion of the copyrighted work (the film) as a whole. howcheng {
chat} 00:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: orphan.) --
Aarktica 16:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used as part of spamming campaign. —
Calton |
Talk 16:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: orphan.) --
Aarktica 16:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
UE, OR, AB, LQ. Used as part of spamming campaign. —
Calton |
Talk 16:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unnecessary unfree image showing three musicians, aparently being used to illustrate the information that theses three musicians pplayed together once, doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali(
talk) 17:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 19:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
This image was uploaded for the sole intention of accusing this non-notable young lady of being a porn star, as a form of 13-year-old libel --
Milton 19:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unencyclopedic orphan image of a non-notable person. —
Matt57(
talk•
contribs) 22:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC).reply
This is a POV issue. Matt wants to remove this person's image and arguments from Wikipedia because Matt says he's not a reliable source. We're in the process of establishing whether he is. Regardless, there's no reason to delete the image because it has a free license.
SlimVirgin(talk) 23:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
A free license doesnt mean that an image can stay. I thought as an administrator you would know that. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of content - that includes images. --
Matt57(
talk•
contribs) 23:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
You don't understand. It's on the Commons, so it can be deleted from here, because we'll still have access to it for the article, if needed.
SlimVirgin(talk)
Then whats the use of the deletion process here, if an image can still stay on the Commons? Do they have their own deletion process? --
Matt57(
talk•
contribs) 03:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, seems to be advertising. —
Bkell (
talk) 23:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Decision: Delete. Executed by
Mikkalai(claim: unused.) --
Aarktica 16:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, seems to be advertising. Obnoxious flashing version of the previous entry. —
Bkell (
talk) 23:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-free image. The source copyright policy contradicts the used tag: derivative work is not authorized. Cannot be re-tagged into fair use: it is a drawing, reproducible by a wikipedian from descriptions `'
юзырь:mikka 23:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)reply