The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned seal for an apparently non-notable school (I can't seem to find a Wikipedia article about it, at least). Uploader claims to be the creator; this is subject to some doubt. —
Bkell (
talk) 00:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Aha—an article has been written about this school, at
Image talk:Saint John Academy.JPG. Not the appropriate place for such an article, and the article does not explain why the school is notable. —
Bkell (
talk) 00:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. No longer orphaned since I moved the article erroneously posted in the image talk space. --
DS1953talk 00:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep. No longer orphaned since I moved the article erroneously posted in the image talk space. --
DS1953talk 00:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Copyright violation, Orphaned ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Copyright violation against whom? Seems like a good chance it could be PD-US, for instance, and a remote one that PD-Self could apply.
WilyD 17:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, text states that permission was given to post to Wikipedia.org but licensed as GFDL
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, unsure if this is an unencyclopedic personal photo or a mistagged non-free image, source information no longer works
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, it appears to be a screenshot of a movie or tv but due to its very small size is very difficult, it is low quality due to its size if it is a free image
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I love Wallace & Gromit, but this image is totally decorative. For one, you can't even see Gromit, and there's already another non-free image of the two of them together. howcheng {
chat} 07:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Image was uploaded with the rationale that it is a DVD cover, image is actually a promotional .gif file of a slug from the movie
Flushed Away, image then added to
Hardcore Punk as a nonsensical/vandal edit. Thus, said picture is uncyclopedic, an orphan image, and a violation of copyright. —
TheLetterM 17:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, image file doesn't appear to exist (clicking on the image gives a 404), probably the same image as
Image:Geoffrey Richman-1950.jpg. —
Bkell (
talk) 19:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
This image
Image:Geoffrey Richman-1950.jpg is being used in a page titled
Dr Geoffrey Richman, as I am new to this editing I made a mistake in the original page title of "Geoffrey Richman", which I now know did not work, this page I hope will be deleted soon. please forgive my error.
orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, likley should be tagged as non-free
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, incorrectly licensed as PD-USGov -- should be a fair use logo as it is created by the state of Pennsylvania
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, claim of being uploaded by executive of orangization and tagged as GFDL - insufficent info to deternine if licensed correctly
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm pretty sure this is a hoax. Either that or the character is so obscure that no Star Wars related site anywhere on the web have any mention of him... Was added to
List of minor Star Wars characters by a user who's only other edits where to vandalise the Force powers article. Even if the character exist this is clarly not a real concept art image of him.
Sherool(talk) 00:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Orphaned seal for an apparently non-notable school (I can't seem to find a Wikipedia article about it, at least). Uploader claims to be the creator; this is subject to some doubt. —
Bkell (
talk) 00:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Aha—an article has been written about this school, at
Image talk:Saint John Academy.JPG. Not the appropriate place for such an article, and the article does not explain why the school is notable. —
Bkell (
talk) 00:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep. No longer orphaned since I moved the article erroneously posted in the image talk space. --
DS1953talk 00:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep. No longer orphaned since I moved the article erroneously posted in the image talk space. --
DS1953talk 00:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Copyright violation, Orphaned ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Copyright violation against whom? Seems like a good chance it could be PD-US, for instance, and a remote one that PD-Self could apply.
WilyD 17:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, text states that permission was given to post to Wikipedia.org but licensed as GFDL
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, unsure if this is an unencyclopedic personal photo or a mistagged non-free image, source information no longer works
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, it appears to be a screenshot of a movie or tv but due to its very small size is very difficult, it is low quality due to its size if it is a free image
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 01:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I love Wallace & Gromit, but this image is totally decorative. For one, you can't even see Gromit, and there's already another non-free image of the two of them together. howcheng {
chat} 07:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Image was uploaded with the rationale that it is a DVD cover, image is actually a promotional .gif file of a slug from the movie
Flushed Away, image then added to
Hardcore Punk as a nonsensical/vandal edit. Thus, said picture is uncyclopedic, an orphan image, and a violation of copyright. —
TheLetterM 17:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Orphan, image file doesn't appear to exist (clicking on the image gives a 404), probably the same image as
Image:Geoffrey Richman-1950.jpg. —
Bkell (
talk) 19:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
This image
Image:Geoffrey Richman-1950.jpg is being used in a page titled
Dr Geoffrey Richman, as I am new to this editing I made a mistake in the original page title of "Geoffrey Richman", which I now know did not work, this page I hope will be deleted soon. please forgive my error.
orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, likley should be tagged as non-free
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, incorrectly licensed as PD-USGov -- should be a fair use logo as it is created by the state of Pennsylvania
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
orphaned image, claim of being uploaded by executive of orangization and tagged as GFDL - insufficent info to deternine if licensed correctly
User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm pretty sure this is a hoax. Either that or the character is so obscure that no Star Wars related site anywhere on the web have any mention of him... Was added to
List of minor Star Wars characters by a user who's only other edits where to vandalise the Force powers article. Even if the character exist this is clarly not a real concept art image of him.
Sherool(talk) 00:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)reply